|
BOXING, WRESTLING, AND MARTIAL ARTS RELATED INJURIES TREATED IN
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 2002-2005
|
Long Island University-Brooklyn Campus, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
| Received |
|
08 December 2006 |
| Accepted |
|
18
June 2007 |
| Published |
|
01
October 2007 |
©
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2007)
6(CSSI-2), 58 - 61
Search
Google Scholar for Citing Articles
| ABSTRACT |
| The incidence of injury in combat sports has not been adequately
reported although it is important to identify the nature and frequency
of injuries prior to the implementation of prevention programs. This
study compared injury rates treated in Hospital Emergency Departments
between different combat sports of boxing, wrestling, and martial
arts. A secondary objective described anatomic region and diagnosis
of these injuries. Data were obtained on all boxing, wrestling, and
martial arts-related injuries that were in the National Electronic
Injury Surveillance System database and resulted in Emergency Department
visits between 2002 and 2005. Pearson's chi-square statistics were
calculated to compare injury rates for each activity accounting for
complex sample design. Martial arts had lower injury rates compared
to boxing and wrestling for all diagnoses (p<0.001). Boxing had
lower injury rates compared to wrestling for strains/sprains and dislocations.
Boxing and wrestling had similar injury rates for concussions. Injury
prevention efforts should consider the distribution of injuries and
concentrate on preventing strains/sprains in wrestling, concussions
in boxing and wrestling, and fractures for all three activities. The
findings of the present study do not provide evidence that combat
sports have alarmingly high rates of injuries resulting in emergency
department visits.
KEY
WORDS: Combat sports injuries, sports injuries, emergency department
visits, complex sample design.
|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
Combat sports frequently involve striking, throwing, or immobilizing
the opponent and therefore are commonly considered more dangerous
compared to other athletic activities. Concerns about serious injuries
in boxing have started a debate in the medical community about whether
boxing should be banned (Lundberg, 1983;
Ioannou, 1984).
In an effort to decrease the number of serious injuries, the governing
bodies of organized combat sports modified rules by decreasing the
duration and number of rounds in boxing or by mandating the use
of protective equipment as in the case of tae kwon do.
Despite of the popularity of combat sports, most studies on the
incidence of injuries involve either a small sample size (Zazryn
et al., 2006)
or report injuries during tournaments (Arriaza and Leyes, 2005).
Additionally, there is disagreement in the literature about the
incidence of injuries in combat sports; some studies suggest that
combat sports are more dangerous for the participants compared to
other sports (Oler et al., 1991;
Jarrett et al., 1998)
while others claim that the rate of injuries in combat sports is
comparable or lower to that of other popular sports like football,
basketball, and soccer (Birrer and Halbrook, 1988;
Porter and O'Brien, 1996;
Tenvergert et al., 1992).
Defining the extent and type of injuries is a prerequisite to the
development of successful injury prevention strategies in combat
sports. To the author's knowledge, the present study is the first
to use Hospital Emergency Department records to compare injury rates
across different combat sports in the general population. A secondary
objective is to describe the anatomic region and diagnosis of these
injuries.
| METHODS |
|
Maintained by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, the National
Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) receives data
on all injury-related visits to emergency departments of 100
hospitals which are a stratified sample of all hospitals with
emergency departments in the US and its territories. Each
case collected has an associated statistical weight based
on the inverse probability of being selected. For the purposes
of the current study, information was extracted on all boxing,
wrestling, and martial arts-related injuries that were in
the NEISS database and resulted in emergency department visits
between 1/1/2002 and 12/31/2005. Only injuries that identified
boxing, wrestling, or martial arts as the primary activity
responsible for the injury were included. The resulting sample
consisted of 7290 cases.
In order to account for exposure, denominator data on the
number of participants and average days of participation for
each one of the three sports came from the American Sports
Data, Inc. "Race, Ethnicity and Sports Participation
in the US" study. This study is a large survey that provides
national estimates on sports participation.
All statistical calculations were performed by using the Statistical
Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 13.0 Complex Samples software
to account for the assigned weights. All injury rates presented
in our study reflect annual national estimates of injuries
per 100,000 player-days of participating in one of the three
combat sports. The effect of sports activity (boxing/wrestling/martial
arts) on injury rates was examined with the use of Pearson's
chi-square test. The level of significance was set a priori
to 0.006 to account for the multiple comparisons performed
in the study. Injury rate estimates of less than 1,200, derived
from less than 20 cases, or with coefficients of variation
higher than 33% were considered unstable and potentially unreliable
(Birrer and Halbrook, 1988).
|
|
| RESULTS |
|
The
vast majority of the 7290 injuries that were treated in emergency
department during the study period did not require hospitalization;
only 1.6% of the injured athletes were admitted. Of the injuries
that required hospitalization, 10.3% were boxing-related, 59.8%
were wrestling-related, and 29.9% were martial arts-related. Boxing
injuries peaked in the 14-30 year old age group; 9.2% of the injuries
involved children 13 years old or younger, 50.2% involved 14-22
year old athletes, 24% involved 23-30 year old athletes, and 17.4%
involved 31 year old or older athletes. Males comprised 88.2% of
all boxing-related injuries. In wrestling, athletes in the younger
than 13 year old age group accounted for 24.5% of the injuries,
in the 14-22 year old age group for 69.3%, in the 23-30 year old
age group for 3.5%, and in the over 31 year old age group for 2.7%.
Males comprised 95.3% of wrestling-related injuries. In martial
arts, the younger than 13 year old age group accounted for 22.7%
of injuries, the 14-22 age group for 25.1% of injuries, the 23-30
age group for 18.6%, and the older than 31 year old age group for
33.6%. Males comprised 67. 8% of martial arts-related injuries.
Table 1 presents the distribution
of the anatomic regions of the body injured by percentage of total
injuries. From the descriptive analysis it is evident that upper
extremities and head/face injuries constitute the most vulnerable
regions for those participating in boxing (87%). The upper and lower
extremities accounted for most injuries in boxing and martial arts.
The
diagnostic distribution of injuries for each one of the three combat
sports category are presented in Table
2. Contusions/abrasions, fractures, and strains/sprains were
the three most frequent diagnoses for all three sports.
The overall injury rate per 100,000 player-days was lower in martial
arts compared to the other two sports (p < 0.001). Boxing had
a lower injury rate compared to wrestling (p = 0.003). Injury rates
as well as group comparisons for the most common diagnoses are presented
in Table 3. None of the injury rate estimates were unstable.
|
| DISCUSSION |
The findings of the present study suggest that injury rates vary
significantly between combat sports. Wrestling had the highest rate
of injuries followed by boxing. Martial arts had the lowest injury
rate compared to those of the other two activities. No other studies
have compared the incidence of injury between boxing, wrestling, and
martial arts. However, a recent study (Zazryn et al., 2006)
calculated the injury rate in boxing and contrasted it with previously
published data on karate suggesting that boxing had a 50%-300% higher
injury rate. In the present study all martial arts were grouped together
which may explain that boxing had a five-fold higher injury rate than
martial arts. However, when mixed martial arts competitions which
is one of the most violent forms of martial arts that combines a free
style combination of striking and grappling arts was compared to boxing
in a recent study (Bledsoe et al., 2006),
mixed martial arts had 65% more injuries than boxing.
The higher injury rate in wrestling compared to boxing is likely due
to more strains/sprains and dislocations. Unlike boxing, wrestling
involves grappling and maneuvering the opponent which frequently results
in extreme positions for the joints. The forces and positions encountered
in wrestling may frequently result in elongation of the muscles and
ligaments beyond their physiologic range. Strains/sprains and dislocations
represented 42.3% of all injuries in wrestling which is consistent
with other reports on wrestling injuries (Jarrett et al., 1998;
Pasque and Hewett, 2000)
pointing to high percentage of strains/sprains and dislocations.
In agreement with a recent systematic review (Koh et al., 2003),
the incidence of boxing-related concussions was higher than the incidence
of martial arts-related concussions. The problem of concussions and
their serious consequences in boxing has received a lot of attention
(Lundberg, 1983;
Ioannou, 1984).
However, little attention has been given on the incidence of concussions
in wrestling. Pasque et al (Pasque and Hewett, 2000)
reported that concussions accounted for 1.4% of all wrestling injuries.
Zazryn
et al., 2003
reported that 16% of injuries in professional boxers were concussions.
The findings of this study suggest that the rate of wrestling- and
boxing-related concussions resulting in emergency department visits
is similar. Concussions occur much more frequently among professional
than amateur boxers (Zazryn et al., 2006),
which may explain the relatively low concussion injury rate due
to boxing that was observed in the present study. Although information
on the severity of concussions was not available, it is likely that
athletes with more serious concussions (grade II and III) visit
the emergency department. It is important to note that the incidence
of concussions in non-combat related team sports such as ice hockey
and football is higher than in combat sports (Koh et al., 2003).
The present study has identified strains/sprains and dislocations
as the injuries mainly accounting for the high injury rate in wrestling
compared to boxing. Additionally, wrestling has similar incidence
rates for concussions to boxing. Biomechanical and video analysis
of wrestling injuries may identify the exact mechanism that results
in strains/sprains, dislocations, and concussions and provide suggestions
for rule changes that will decrease injury rates.
The findings of the present study suggest that the incidence of
serious injury among combat sports practitioners is small. Only
1.6% of emergency department visits resulted in hospitalization
which is comparable to the findings of Birrer et al (Birrer and
Halbrook, 1988)
who reported that 1% of martial arts-related visits to emergency
departments resulted in hospitalization. Although comparison of
combat sports-related with non-combat sports-related emergency department
visits is beyond the scope of this study, it is noteworthy that
the emergency department injury rate for basketball which is the
most popular team sport in the United States was 45 injuries/100,000
player days for the same time period 2002-2005. Therefore, it appears
that basketball has a 10% higher injury rate than wrestling, 50%
higher injury rate than boxing, and more than seven times higher
injury rate than martial arts. Jarret et al. (1998)
investigated injury rates in collegiate sports and reported that
wrestling had higher injury rate than basketball. The discrepancy
in the findings of the two studies may be related to the different
populations studied and the type of injuries; the present study
investigated only injuries that resulted in emergency department
visits in the general population while the study on collegiate sports
investigated all injuries that resulted in restriction of participation
for one or more days. Further research should compare the injury
rate between combat sports and non-combat sports.
Fractures were the second most frequent diagnosis for each activity
representing more than 20% of the total injuries. The mechanism
of injury that results in fractures varies between activities; in
tae kwon do and boxing fractures occur during kicking or punching
while in wrestling and judo they are more likely to occur during
falling.
The distribution of wrestling injuries per anatomic region suggests
that the upper extremities are injured more frequently followed
by the lower extremities. This is consistent with the findings of
Pasque et al (Pasque and Hewett, 2000)
and implies that prevention efforts in wrestling should concentrate
on the extremities because trunk and head/face injuries are not
injured as frequently. Similarly, the extremities were more frequently
injured in martial arts but the lower extremities were more frequently
injured than the upper extremities. Birrer and Halbrook, 1988
also used the NEISS data and reported that the lower extremities
were more frequently injured than the upper extremities in martial
arts. However, there is a small decrease in lower extremities injuries
between the two studies (from 46.9% to 41.6%) which may reflect
the more widespread use of leg protective equipment in martial arts
styles such as tae kwon do in the last 20 years.
In contrast to the low incidence of non-extremity injuries in wrestling
and martial arts, head/face injuries in boxing represent 23.3% of
the total injuries. The high incidence of head/face injuries in
boxing as reported in the present study is consistent with other
studies (Zazryn et al., 2006)
and suggests that efforts should be made to develop better materials
that limit the transfer of impact from the upper extremity to the
face during a punch. A biomechanical study (Schwartz et al., 1986)
showed that the effectiveness of box gloves in reducing acceleration
of the target is limited.
Due to their competitive spirit, required discipline, and beneficial
physiologic effects combat sports have been particularly popular
among active youth. However, concerns about high incidence of injuries
are common among parents and health care professionals. The present
study provides evidence that martial arts have a relatively low
incidence of injury while wrestling has a high incidence of injury.
This finding may help create awareness among participants, coaches,
parents, and heath care professionals about the relative safety
of martial arts compared to other combat sports.
The high incidence of sprains/sprains and dislocations found among
wrestlers is particularly concerning especially since joint trauma
is associated with early degenerative changes (Roos et al., 1998;
von Porat et al., 2004).
Injury prevention efforts in wrestling should focus on decreasing
strains, sprains, and dislocations by developing protective equipment
and modifying rules in a way that promotes avoidance of extreme
joint positions.
Limitations
of the study
Although
the findings of this study are an important first step toward characterization
of combat sports injuries in the general population, its retrospective
design carries with it several limitations. Injury and exposure
data came from surveys that have an inherent error of measurement.
Additionally, the injuries for all martial arts styles were grouped
together. Martial arts consist of styles that are very different
and may have different injury patterns. Tae kwon do promotes attacking
the face and head with punches and kicks, judo involves grappling,
and tai chi is non-contact. Previous investigators have shown that
significant differences exist between the different martial arts
styles in respect to incidence of injury; tae kwon had the highest
incidence and tai chi had the lowest (Zetaruk et al., 2005).
Only injuries treated in Emergency Departments were included in
this study. A more comprehensive assessment of combat sports injuries
should include all injuries in order to provide more accurate descriptions
of the injury rate within each activity.
|
| CONCLUSION |
| This study provides evidence that there are significant differences
between boxing-, wrestling-, and martial arts-related injury rates
treated at emergency departments. Martial arts had the lowest injury
rate from the three activities. Compared to boxing, wrestling had
higher strains/sprains and dislocations. The overall injury rate for
combat sports does not appear to be higher than in popular non-combat
sports. |
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
| The author thanks Mariya Shiyko for her help with the statistical
aspects of the study. |
| KEY
POINTS |
-
Martial arts have lower emergency department injury rates compared
to boxing and wrestling.
- Wrestling
has higher strains/sprains and dislocation injury rates compared
to boxing.
- Combat
sports do not appear to have higher injury rates compared to non-combat
sports.
|
| AUTHOR
BIOGRAPHY |
Evangelos
PAPPAS
Employment: Assistant Professor, Division of Physical Therapy,
Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY.
Degree: PT, PhD.
Research interests: Biomechanics, athletic injuries,
motion analysis.
E-mail: evangelos.pappas@liu.edu |
|
|
|
|