|
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY TESTING OF AN ARCHERY CHRONOMETER
|
1Middle
East Technical University, Physical Education and Sports Department, Ankara,
Turkey
2Wolfson School of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough
University, UK
3Middle East Technical University, Mechanical Engineering Department,
Ankara,
Turkey
| Received |
|
04 August 2004 |
| Accepted |
|
24
February 2005 |
| Published |
|
01
June 2005 |
©
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2005) 4, 95 - 104
Search
Google Scholar for Citing Articles
| ABSTRACT |
| Keeping
the arrow velocity constant during consecutive shots and responding
to "clicker's fall" are considered to be an important feature
of archery performance. A specially designed device called an archery
chronometer was developed to measure the reaction time of an archer
to clicker's fall, arrow velocity, and external factors that may affect
arrow velocity. The purposes of this study were to test (1) the validity
of Clicker Reaction Time (CRT) measurer, and (2) the reliability of
CRT in accordance with the Flying Time (FT)/Average Speed (AS), temperature
(TEMP), wind speed (WS) and wind direction (WD) measurements. 20 elite
archers participated in this study. The Reaction Time (RT), which
was derived from EMG values and CRT from the archery chronometer were
correlated to test the validity of the CRT measurer. The test re-test
method was applied to test the reliability of archery chronometer.
CRT scores were related with RT scores (r = .787, p < 0.01). The
archery chronometer was valid in terms of predicting reaction time.
The device was found to be reliable in measuring CRT, AS, FT, WS,
WD, and TEMP. It was concluded that archery chronometer could be used
for technical evaluation and enhancing ones shooting technique in
archery.
KEY
WORDS: Archery, electromyography (EMG), reaction time, muscular
analysis.
|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
Archery
can be described as a comparatively static sport requiring strength
and endurance of the upper body, in particular the forearm and shoulder
girdle (Mann and Littke, 1989).
Skill in archery is defined as the ability to shoot an arrow to
a given target in a certain time span with accuracy (Leroyer et
al., 1993).
The discipline is described as a six-phase movement in terms of
shooting technique by Nishizono et al. (1987);
Bow Hold, Drawing, Full Draw, Aiming, Release, and Follow-through.
Each of these phases represents a stable sequence of movements and
is ideal for studying the motor control and skill acquired during
this voluntary kinematical process. However, Pekalski (1990)
differentiated shooting technique from bow-arrow-archer interaction.
He stated the paramount importance of the movement of the arrow
in archery. He divided arrow movement into two phases: (1) the interaction
between an arrow and archer-bow subsystem that lasts from the moment
of releasing the bowstring until the arrow loses contact with the
bow and the bowstring. (2) Ballistic flight: This lasts from the
end of phase 1 until the arrow hits the target.
An important feature of archery is keeping the arrow velocity constant
during consecutive shots (Marconnet and Komi, 1987).
The arrow velocity can be affected from the shooting technique (release
and/or follow through phases) of the archer, weather conditions
(e.g. wind, rain, and heat) and any technical dysfunction of the
bow and/or arrows. Having different arrow velocities necessitate
examining the shooting technique of the archer, weather conditions,
and equipment. A coach or the archer can standardize the equipment
factors by having exactly the same size and weight arrows and using
a device called "clicker" to fix the drawing weight of
the bow constant.
The bowstring is released when an auditory stimulus is received
from the clicker. A standard drawing length and release can be obtained
using this device (Ertan et al., 2003;
Ertan et al., 2004).
The archer will not be able to control the drawing length and weight
of the bow if s/he does not respond to the stimulus from the clicker
as quickly as possible. Losing the control of the drawing length
of the arrow and the weight of the bow will cause a difference in
the release weight of the bowstring and flying velocity of the arrow.
Thus, having a quick reaction to the clicker's fall (sound) is directly
related with the performance of the archer (Ertan et al., 1996).
So, Reaction Time (RT) is used to classify the archers as elite,
intermediate or beginners. Elite archers (Olympic and world championship
medalists) have displayed better RT values than that of intermediate
and beginner archers (Landers et al., 1986).
However, their measurements were not during archery shooting. They
have given an auditory stimulus to their subjects and the subjects
were supposed to response to this stimulus as quickly as possible
by pressing a button, which stops the counting machine. As long
as their measurement was more than a RT measurement (Schmidt, 1999),
it has given an idea about the importance of the response timing
in differentiating the archers in different performance levels.
A device called "an archery chronometer", which is appropriate
to the field settings in archery, was developed to measure (1) the
reaction time of an archer to the clicker's fall (Clicker Reaction
Time: CRT), (2) Flying Time (FT) and/or Average Speed (AS) of the
arrow over a given distance, (3) Wind Speed (WS) and Direction (WD),
and (4) Temperature (TEMP). The device is developed both to constitute
a baseline from a different aspect for archery performance prediction
and to analyze the relations connected to the equipment parameters
and archer's shooting technique (Ertan et al., 1996).
It was hypothesized that (i) archery chronometer will make valid
CRT measurement compared to the EMG measurement of forearm finger
extensor muscles and (ii) reliable (reproducible) CRT, Flying Time
(FT)/Average Speed (AS), temperature (TEMP), wind speed (WS) and
direction (WD) measurements. The purposes of the study are;
1.
To examine the validity of CRT measurement device.
2.
To examine the reliability of the Flying Time (FT) / Average Speed
(AS), temperature (TEMP), wind speed (WS) and direction (WD) measurements
using the CRT device.
|
| METHODS |
|
Participants
Twenty elite archers (10 women, 10 men) were involved in this study.
The subject group consisted of the Turkish national team archers
and candidate archers for the team. The subjects were recruited
during a preparation camp that was held just before an international
competition. 10 of the subjects were junior archers. Information
on the participants including the Federation Internationale de Tir
a'lArc (FITA) scores, years of archery experience, and ages are
presented in Table 1. Written
informed consent was obtained from all of the subjects and from
their guardians/parents for those who were below 18 years old before
participation to the study.
Procedures
Validity testing of CRT
Each subject participated in a single test session in the Biomechanics
Laboratory, where the EMG activity of flexor digitorum superficialis
and extensor digitorum muscles were quantified and CRT was measured.
The EMG and CRT measurement methods were synchronized with each
other. Archery chronometer was placed on the bow handle, and then
a switch was attached under the clicker. These two systems were
isolated from each other in order to shun cross-talk effect among
measurement devices. The subjects shot 12 arrows for validity testing
of "Clicker Reaction Time Measurer" in the laboratory.
Reliability
testing of archery chronometer
Two trials were made for reliability testing of archery chronometer
for CRT, FT/AS, WS, WD, and TEMP measurement methods; second one
was made one week later than that of the first one (test-retest
approach). Subjects shot 12 arrows for first and second trials from
70 m in an archery field. These two measurements were compared with
each other to examine the test-retest reliability of the device
for each of the sub-measurement methods in it. The subjects were
the same for both validity and reliability testing.
Archery chronometer
A specially designed device called an archery chronometer, which
measures (1) CRT, (2) FT/AS, (3) TEMP and (4) WS and WD, was developed
by Ertan et al. (1996).
This device (Prosport TMR ESC 3100 Archery Chronometer) consists
of four main components: (1) Screen, (2) CRT Measurement Device,
(3) WS and WD Measurement Device, and (4) Vibration Sensor.
Screen
Seven different measurement results can concurrently be displayed
on the screen of the archery chronometer: (1) CRT, (2) FT, (3) AS,
(4) WS, (5) WD, (6) TEMP and (7) Battery Level (Bat). The device
can make the measurement with 0.1 % second sensitivity and 0.01
% precision error. The screen is constructed with a LED panel, which
is 32x128 resolutions in pixels, for indoor or outdoor use.
Clicker reaction time measurement
A conductor metal, which has two heads, is placed under the clicker.
One of the heads is attached under the clicker and the other is
fixed on the bow handle. In addition to this, a sensor, weighting
150 g and sensitive to metal, is placed on the bow handle 1.5 cm
away from the clicker (Figure 1).
The body of sensor, which has 24Vdc (Max) switching voltage and
1.0A switching current, is .22 in. and the diameter .14 in. During
the CRT measurement, the arrow is placed under the clicker likewise
all the archers do for each shot (Figure
2). The archer starts drawing the bowstring and reaches full
draw (Figure 3).
The
fall of the clicker brings the two heads together, which initiates
the chronometer. As a response to the fall of the clicker, the archer
releases the bowstring by opening the three-finger hook of the drawing
hand. The arrow is pushed forward powerfully by the bowstring and
the point of the arrow passes in front of the sensor with. The chronometer
stops counting after sensing the metal tip point of the arrow (Figure
4). Ertan et al. (1996)
defines this time interval as the CRT.
Flying
time and average speed measurement
As the metal tip point of the arrow passes in front of the sensor,
the CRT measurement ends and the FT measurement starts (Figure
4). The arrow covers the shooting distance and hits the target
causing a measurable vibration on it. A switch detects the vibration
associated with the motion by arrow hit on the target rather than
the motion of arrow itself. The signal signifying the arrow's hit
to the target is sent to the main unit telemetrically. The main
unit stops the chronometer by receiving the telemetric impulse that
is indicator of arrow hit. The FT and AS of the arrow can accurately
be measured by this method for an identified distance according
to the FITA rules (FITA, 2002).
The following formula is used for calculation; V = X/t formula [where;
V = speed (m·sec-1), X = distance (m), and t = time (sec)].
Wind speed and wind direction measurement
WS is measured as m·sec-1 and the WD is measured in degrees.
The WS and WD measurers are attached to the main unit. It is placed
at the midpoint of the shooting distance parallel to the shooting
line. During the shot, the device continuously measures the WS and
WD. As soon as the clicker snaps, the chronometer records the WS
and WD. These parameters are displayed on the screen at the same
time with the arrow release.
Data processing for validity testing of CRT measurement
Validity testing of the CRT was made under the laboratory conditions.
Each subject participated in a single test session. Electromyographic
activity of the Muscle flexor digitorum superficialis and Muscle
extensor digitorum contractions were quantified by the use of OCTOPUS
Analog Multiplexed cable Telemetry 8 channel device (AMT-8) concomitantly
with the CRT measurements. Electrode sites were prepared by shaving,
abrading and cleansing the area. Skin tack F55 surface electrodes,
filled with conductive electrolyte were positioned longitudinally
along each muscle. The distance between two electrodes was approximately
2 cm. The reference electrode was placed on the olecranon process
of the ulna of the drawing arm. The mechanical switch was attached
under the clicker to accurately measure both the point of the clicker
fall on EMG recordings and initiate archery chronometer for CRT
measurements.
Participants completed twelve successive shots. EMG recordings were
made for 5 seconds; 2.5 seconds prior and 2.5 seconds after the
clicker's fall. This period included the last seconds of the full
draw, aiming, the first seconds of release and follow through phases.
Absolute values of 2 seconds; one second before and one second after
the clicker's impetus were processed to obtain rectified EMG data.
Reaction Time (RT) (Schmidt, 1991;
Oxendine, 1968;
Kerr, 1982;
Latash, 1998)
is defined as the time interval between the stimulus and the initiation
of response. During a substantial part of the RT, the EMG is silent;
indicating that the command to move the finger had not yet reached
the finger muscles (Schmidt, 1991).
This latent period is the time the impulse is transmitted from the
sensory organs to the central nervous system and then to the muscles
(Latash, 1998).
The muscle is activated in late RT, however; no movement occurs
for 40 to 80 milliseconds. The interval from the stimulus to the
first muscular contraction recorded in EMG is termed premotor
RT and is thought to represent the central nervous system processes.
The interval from the first change in EMG to finger movement is
termed motor RT and represents the processes associated with
the muscle itself. Movement time (MT) is usually defined as the
interval from the initiation of the response (the end of RT) to
the completion of the movement. The sum of RT and MT is termed as
the response time (Figure
5).
The clicker's fall is defined as the stimulus. The peak latency
of EMG data was considered as the RT in the current study. Thus,
the time gap between stimulus (clicker's fall) and response (initiation
of muscular activity) is decided. From the definitions given above,
the initiation of muscular activity in the forearm muscles including
latent period and contraction time (Vander et al., 1990)
was considered to be the RT for the arrow release movement. Reaction
times were obtained from the rectified EMG data for each shot of
each subject (Figure 6). So,
there were totally 240 RT scores for the whole subject group.
Data
processing for reliability of archery chronometer
The reliability testing measurements were made in the archery field.
Each of the subjects shot 12 arrows from 70 m. All the subjects
were those who participated in the laboratory measurements for validity
testing. Measurements were made in a suitable weather condition
for the archery shooting (without rain and strong wind). A week
later all measurements were repeated with the same subjects in the
same shooting order and in the same weather conditions (without
rain and strong wind).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were applied to summarize the characteristics
of the subjects. The mean CRT and RT scores of each archer's twelve
shoots were correlated by the Pearson Correlation Coefficient test
for the validity testing of CRT measurer. For reliability testing,
the mean of each subject's twelve shots was calculated and the data
were analyzed with the Kolmogorov / Smirnov test. Reliability of
the measurement of the archery chronometer over two sessions was
estimated via interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC model
3.1 was selected because of its appropriateness for testing test-retest
reliability (Swanenburg et al., 2003).
In addition to classical analysis of reliability using ICC, Bland
and Altman plots were also used to gain more information on the
reliability of measurements (Bland and Altman, 1986).
Bland-Altman plots are used to show ranges for the repeatability
of the measurements and they show the differences between paired
observations against the mean value of the two observations. A wider
scatter from the zero difference line indicates a poorer reproducibility.
The 95% limits of agreement are defined by ± 1.96 standard deviations
of the data. We can use these limits of agreement to define whether
changes in future field measurements are significant or whether
they lie within the bounds of the variability of the measurement.
|
| RESULTS |
|
Validity
results of CRT measurement device
The mean score for CRT was found to be higher than RT (Table
2). The difference between CRT and RT was statistically significant
(p = 0.027). CRT scores were related to RT scores (r = 0.787, p
< 0.01).
Reliability results of archery chronometer
All data appeared to be normally distributed. The information on
six data pairs is given in Table
3. There was a significant difference between two sessions of
FT, AS, WS, WD, and TEMP, but no significant difference between
two sessions of CRT. The results of the paired t-test are listed
in Table 4.
The reliability of CRT measurer was ICC (3, 1) .985 with
a 95% confidence interval of .962 - .994. The reliability of FT
measurer was ICC (3, 1) .992 with a 95% confidence interval
of .980 - .996. The reliability of AS measurer was ICC (3,
1) .990 with a 95% confidence interval of .976 - .996. The
reliability of WS measurer was ICC (3, 1) 1.000 with
a 95% confidence interval of 1.000 - 1.000. The reliability of WD
measurer was ICC (3, 1) .742 with a 95% confidence interval
of .456 - 0.889. The reliability of TEMP measurer was ICC (3,
1) .938 with a 95% confidence interval of .850 - 0.975.
Figure 7, 8,
9, 10,
11, 12
show how the individual measurements vary from the mean for each
measurement method of archery chronometer. Differences against mean
plots were used regarding the reliability of all measurements. The
reliability again appears to be sufficient as all the data points
were inside ± 1.96 standard deviation of the mean of the two measurements
(Figure 7, 8,
9, 10,
11, 12).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
Validity
evidence of CRT measurer in measuring the response to clicker's
fall showed that the time interval, which is named as CRT, could
be used as a predictor of RT in archery. CRT, which is longer than
RT, includes both RT (pre-motor and motor times) and the beginning
stages of Movement Time (MT). When a total response in reaction
to any stimulus is considered, CRT almost equals to the response
time according to the definition of RT paradigm (Figure
5). Since the clicker's fall is accepted as an auditory stimulus
in archery, the time interval that is measured by the newly developed
device consists of an active contraction of the muscle extensor
digitorum and a gradual relaxation of the muscle flexor digitorum
superficialis (Ertan et al., 2003).
There is also sufficient evidence to claim that Archery Chronometer
is able to make reliable measurements of CRT, FT, AS, TEMP, WS and
WD. It can measure any differentiation in CRT, AS, and FT and facilitate
to relate these three parameters to WS, WD, and TEMP, since drawing
weight of the bow and the weight, length, insertion, and feathers
of an arrow is always constant for an archer. Therefore, Archery
Chronometer can be used for evaluating the archers' shooting technique
and the bow-arrow interaction.
When we consider CRT measurement, an archer releases the bowstring
by opening three-finger hook of the drawing hand and the point of
the arrow covers 1.5 cm distance. During the CRT measurement, the
arrow is in interaction with the bow and the archer. The response
time of an archer to the clicker's fall is a unique method to have
an idea about the archer's shooting technique by correlating CRT
with the scores on the target. The link between CRT and the score
on the target can be observed. Moreover, possible effects of CRT
on scores can be evaluated. Thus, the interaction between an arrow
and archer-bow subsystem (Pekalski, 1990)
can be analyzed in this way.
FT/AS measurement immediately follows the CRT measurement. Archery
Chronometer can also be used as an indicator for ballistic flight
of an arrow. The phase 1, which defines the arrow-bow-archer interaction,
affects the phase 2 or in other words the ballistic flight. Evaluation
of FT/AS of an arrow facilitates to analyze both the ballistic flight
itself and release technique of an archer. Ballistic flight may
also be affected by the wind. The speed and the direction of the
wind may alter the flying speed of an arrow. One of the advantages
of the developed device is that the researcher can gather data on
the effect of wind.
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
| It
is concluded that the Archery Chronometer is valid in terms of predicting
RT and reliable in measuring CRT, FT, AS, TEMP, WS and WD. Thus, Archery
Chronometer can be used by the coaches and the archers to evaluate
and enhance shooting technique in the natural settings of their training
environment. |
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
| Middle
East Technical University Scientific Research Grant number BAP 2002-050403
funded this study. The authors thank to the president and secretary
general Prof. Dr. Uğur Erdener and Elif Ekşi of the Turkish Archery
Federation, respectively. |
| KEY
POINTS |
- Clicker
Reaction Time could be used as a predictor of Reaction Time in
archery.
- Archery
Chronometer can be used for evaluating the archers' shooting technique
and the bow-arrow interaction.
- Archery
Chronometer can also be used as an indicator for ballistic flight
of an arrow.
- Archery
Chronometer can be used by the coaches and the archers to evaluate
and enhance shooting technique in the natural settings of their
training environment.
|
| AUTHORS
BIOGRAPHY |
Hayri ERTAN
Employment: PhD student at Middle East Technical University,
Department of Physical Education and Sports, Ankara, Turkey.
Degree: PhD Candidate
Research interests: Electrophysiological measurement
methods especially surface electromyography, auditory event
- related potentials.
E-mail: hertan@metu.edu.tr |
|
Behzat B. KENTEL
Employment: Research student (PhD) at Wolfson School of
Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University,
UK.
Degree: MSc
Research interests: Biomechanics, gait analysis, simulation
modeling.
E-mail: B.B.Kentel@lboro.ac.uk |
|
S. Turgut TÜMER
Employment: Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Middle
East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Degree: PhD
Research interests: Modeling of human joints, development
of motion analysis systems, normal and pathological gait, motor
control.
E-mail: tumer@metu.edu.tr
|
|
Feza KORKUSUZ
Employment: Head of the Department of Physical Education
and Sports and Health and Caring Center at Middle East Technical
University, Ankara, Turkey.
Degree: MD
Research interests: Exercise physiology, biomechanics,
performance optimization in sport.
E-mail: feza@metu.edu.tr |
|
|
|
|