|
JOURNAL
OF
SPORTS SCIENCE &
MEDICINE
|
|
Research
article
|
SEASON-TO-SEASON VARIATIONS OF PHYSIOLOGICAL FITNESS WITHIN A SQUAD OF PROFESSIONAL MALE SOCCER PLAYERS |
|||||||||
Niall A. Clark1, Andrew M. Edwards2,3 |
|||||||||
1Charlton Athletic FC, London, UK, 2UCOL Institute of Technology, Applied Health Sciences, New Zealand, 3Leeds Metropolitan University, Carnegie Research Institute, Leeds, UK, 4Massey University, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, New Zealand. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
© Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2008) 7, 157 - 165 Search Google Scholar for Citing Articles |
|||||||||
|
|
| ABSTRACT | ||||||||||||
| The purpose of this study was to examine season-to-season variations
in physiological fitness parameters among a 1st team squad of professional
adult male soccer players for the confirmatory purposes of identifying normative
responses (immediately prior to pre-season training (PPS), mid-season (MID),
and end-of-season (EOS)). Test-retest data were collected from a student
population on the primary dependent variables of anaerobic threshold (AT)
and maximal aerobic power (VO2 max) to define meaningful measurement
change in excess of test-retest technical error between test-to-test performances.
Participants from a pool of 42 professional soccer players were tested over
a set sequence of tests during the 3-year period: 1) basic anthropometry,
2) countermovement jump (CMJ) tests 3) a combined AT and VO2
max test. Over the 3-year period there were no test-to-test changes in mean
VO2 max performance exceeding pre-defined limits of test agreement
(mean of eight measures: 61.6 ± 0.6 ml·kg-1·min-1).
In contrast, VO2 at AT was significantly higher at the MID test
occasion in seasons 2 (+4.8%; p = 0.04, p < 0.05) and 3 (+6.8%; p = 0.03,
p < 0.05). The CMJ tests showed a test-to-test improvement of 6.3% (best
of 3 jumps) (p = 0.03, p < 0.05) and 10.3% (20-s sustained jumping test)
(p = 0.007, p < 0.01) between PPS2 and MID2 and thereafter remained stable.
Anthropometrics were unaffected. In summary, despite some personnel changes
in the elite cohort between test-to-test occasions, VO2 max values
did not vary significantly over the study which supports previous short-term
observations suggesting a general 'elite' threshold of 60 ml·kg-1
min. Interestingly, AT significantly varied where VO2 max was
stable and these variations also coincided with on- and off-seasons suggesting
that AT is a better indication of acute training state than VO2
max.
Key words: Aerobic power, anaerobic threshold, countermovement jump, elite athletes. |
|
| METHODS | ||||||||||||
|
Subjects Test-retest
reliability of the cardiopulmonary fitness test protocol Professional
soccer players Test
series Test
procedures Blood
sampling Statistical
analyses |
|
| RESULTS | ||||||||||||
|
Preliminary
data: test-retest reliability of cardiopulmonary fitness test measurements Cardiopulmonary
fitness Countermovement
jump (CMJ) performance tests Body
mass and composition |
|
| DISCUSSION | ||||||||||||
|
The
main observation of this study was that mean VO2 max remained
relatively stable among a homogenous population of elite soccer players
and, in contrast to AT, did not change with different phases of the off-
and on-seasons. Despite occasional test-to-test changes in personnel,
the significant differences observed in AT measurements compared with
VO2 max (in the same players) clearly identifies AT as the
more sensitive measure of training state. This observation confirms our
previous observations from single test off- and on-season (Edwards et
al., 2003a).
Although VO2 max and AT responded similarly over the duration
of the study, the magnitude of change according to our criteria was only
of biological meaning in AT and these observations are supported by several
generic laboratory investigations reporting increases in measures of the
anaerobic threshold without parallel changes in VO2 max (Denis
et al., 1982;
Edwards et al., 2003a;
Henritze et al., 1985).
Figure 2 illustrates the observation
that AT demonstrated both significant changes and these were also in excess
of the pre-set limits we identified as estimates of test-to-test measurement
error. Our finding also supports the use of this technique to infer an
element of control in elite athlete studies where it is not always possible
to include a comparative control group. This may encourage others to report
data from elite populations which would be of assistance to the further
understanding of high quality performances across different sports. |
|
| AUTHORS BIOGRAPHY | |
Niall CLARK Employment: Head of Sports Science at Charlton Athletic FC. Degree: MSc. Research interests: The physiology of elite soccer performance. |
|
Andrew M. EDWARDS Employment: Assoc Professor at UCOL Institute of Technology (NZ) and Visiting Research Fellow of Leeds Metropolitan University (UK). Degree: PhD. Research interests: Thermoregulatory and respiratory responses to elite sports performance. E-mail: a.m.edwards@ucol.ac.nz |
|
R. Hugh MORTON Employment: Assoc Professor of Sport Science and Biostatistics at Massey University (NZ). Degree: PhD. Research interests: Sports data analyses, mathematical models of response to exercise. E-mail: H.Morton@massey.ac.nz |
|
Ron J. BUTTERLY Employment: Principal Lecturer in Exercise Physiology at Leeds Metropolitan University (UK). Degree: PhD. Research interests: Energetics and physiology of ball games. E-mail: R.Butterly@leedsmet.ac.uk |