|
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of fatigue
and gender on frontal plane knee motion, EMG amplitudes, and GRF magnitudes
during drop-jump landing. We hypothesized that women would exhibit: 1)
greater dynamic frontal plane motion, 2) less EMG amplitudes, and 3) less
GRF magnitudes than men. We also hypothesized that fatigue would result
in 4) greater dynamic valgus, 5) greater EMG amplitudes, and 6) less GRF
magnitudes in both men and women.
There was a significant fatigue main effect for the Pkf variable and a
fatigue by gender interaction effect for the FPrommax variable, but there
were no differences between men and women (gender main effect) for any
variable. Therefore, the first hypothesis that women would exhibit greater
dynamic frontal plane knee motion was not supported. Our results do not
support many reports from the literature that men and women differ in
frontal plane knee motion (Boden et al., 2000;
Derrick, 2004;
Hewett et al., 1996;
James et al., 2001;
Madigan and Pidcoe, 2003;
Marson and Goncalves, 2003;
McLean et al., 1999;
Nyland et al., 1994;
Rozzi et al., 2000).
The discrepancy between our results and other reports in the literature
may be due to differences in the technology used to obtain frontal plane
knee motion measurements, differences in subjects, or differences in the
activity. First, we elected to use a direct measure of frontal plane knee
motion via an electrogoniometer. The goniometer provides a measurement
of the frontal plane angle between the thigh and leg and did not account
for lower extremity or knee positioning involving thigh or leg rotation.
Second, our subjects were college-age recreational athletes and this group
of subjects may not exhibit extreme characteristics often observed in
trained athletes. Finally, many of the previous studies have investigated
the gender differences with activities other than drop-jump landings (Boden
et al., 2000;
James et al., 2001;
McLean et al., 1999;
Nyland et al., 1994)
and it could be that our 50 cm bilateral landing activity did not elucidate
actual differences. Hewett et al., 1996
however, found that high school female athletes, regardless of their physical
training level, exhibited excessive frontal plane motion (into the direction
of valgus) at the knee when dropping from a 60 cm platform, which was
not exhibited by age-matched males. Ford et al., 2003
reported that high school female athletes displayed significantly higher
maximum valgus angles than their male counterparts during drop-jump landings.
Hewett et al., 2004
reported that mature (high school age) females lost neuromuscular control
that lead to increased valgus motion at the knee when compared to immature
(pre-pubescent) female subjects. Thus, subject age may have influenced
the differences observed in our present study, where we enlisted college-
age subjects versus the younger (primary and secondary aged) subjects
used in other studies. McLean et al., 2007
reported that fatigue induced greater valgus moments earlier in women
than in men during jump landing a jump landing activity, but we did not
evaluate joint moments.
The second hypothesis that women would exhibit less EMG amplitudes than
men also was not supported. While many women may exhibit less strength
than men, the amplitude of neural input to the muscle appears to be similar
during drop-jump landing. However, it has been reported that women can
generate a greater RMS for quadriceps activation during knee flexion movements
(White et al, 2003).
Other EMG variables used to assess muscle function include recruitment
sequence and timing. These variables have been used to compare genders
with conflicting results (Huston and Wojtys, 1996).
Therefore, the role of these variables in ACL injury is still unclear
and warrants further investigation. The similarities of the EMG amplitudes
between men and women in the current study provide further support for
the similarities observed in frontal plane knee motion. The men and women
in our study may not have differed on these dependent measures, suggesting
that individual subject characteristics may have been more important than
gender for determining landing performance.
The third hypothesis that women would have less GRF magnitudes than men
was not supported. Ground reaction forces are influenced by muscle contraction,
body motion, body geometry, and other factors (James, et al, 2006).
In the current study, as previously indicated, there were no differences
between men and women in frontal plane kinematics or EMG amplitude. Additionally,
there appeared descriptively to be no difference between genders in knee
flexion angle at contact or knee flexion ROM. These results likely explain
the similarities between genders in Pkf, further suggesting that any differences
between men and women were superseded by the variations in individual
subject characteristics.
The fourth hypothesis that both men and women would have greater frontal
plane knee motion during the fatigued landings was not supported by the
group analysis. Single subject analyses indicated that some subjects increased
valgus during fatigued landings, while other subjects increased varus.
Markolf et al., 1995
indicated that both varus and valgus positions of the knee can load the
ACL particularly when accompanied by sagittal and transverse plane motions.
Therefore, the single subject results observed in our study are important
because they might indicate which subjects are at a greater risk of loading
the knee ligament systems in either varus or valgus during fatigued landings.
The richness of the single subject descriptions suggests that individuals
are variable in their behaviors and that different behaviors reflecting
altered neuromuscular control of the knee may occur during fatigued drop-jump
landing, possibly exposing the ACL to potentially injurious forces. Based
on Markolf et al., 1995,
we speculate that subjects who demonstrated excessive varus or valgus
positional behaviors during landing may have increased risk of ACL injury.
Moreover, the variability among subjects may explain why we did not observe
the consistent valgus differences between men and women that other investigators
have previously reported. Had we limited our analysis to only the aggregate
group data and explored only valgus behaviors, we likely would have missed
identifying potentially risky knee kinematic behaviors in some subjects.
Similarly, the single subject results revealed several significant increases
(varus and valgus) in frontal plane angle at 30 degrees of flexion as
a result of fatigue. This may help to explain why the majority of non-contact
ACL injuries occur with the knee in less than 30 degrees of flexion (Boden
et al., 2000;
Colby et al., 2000).
In this position the quadriceps muscles are at an optimal angle to provide
anterior shear force and the hamstrings are at a mechanical disadvantage
to co-contract and protect the ligament systems. Renström et al., 1986
reported that the quadriceps muscles could significantly increase the
strain on the ACL at flexion angles less than 45 degrees during simulated
isometric and isotonic contractions when compared with passive normal
strain. Although there may be an increased strain on the ACL in response
to these muscle-generated anterior shear forces, these findings are controversial
in terms of their contribution to knee ligament injury. McLean et al.,
2004
demonstrated that anterior shear forces cannot reach great enough magnitudes
to cause the ACL to fail in subject-specific forward dynamic musculoskeletal
models. However, the inability of the hamstrings to co-contract will allow
anterior shear force in the sagittal plane, thus limiting the hamstrings'
ability to protect the knee joint from frontal plane motions (Colby et
al., 2000;
Osternig et al., 1995).
This combination of motions may be sufficient for producing a pathomechanical
load of the ACL.
Single-subject results also revealed that several male and female subjects
had significant increases in FProm30 and FPrommax motions during fatigued
landings, yet differential responses among subjects precluded definitive
group results. Moreover, these increases in ROM were not strictly limited
to one direction of movement. The majority of subjects oscillated between
varus and valgus throughout knee motion in the sagittal plane. This may
help provide insight about neuromuscular control patterns observed during
the drop-jump landing activity in our study.
The effect of fatigue on frontal plane motion at the knee joint has not
been studied by many researchers. Huston and Wojtys, 1996
reported that women rely more on their quadriceps than their hamstrings
in response to anterior tibial translation during a fatigued state, which
increases strain on the ACL. They also reported that females took significantly
longer than males to generate peak hamstring torque during isokinetic
testing. However, the Huston and Wojtys, 1996
study did not include functional activities and only focused on a single
lower extremity. Wojtys and Huston et al. (1996)
showed that isotonic and isokinetic strength training of the lower extremity
musculature does not appear to improve reaction time to anterior tibial
translation, whereas agility exercises do. This result is similar to what
has been reported, which indicates agility and plyometric exercise can
increase functional stability of the knee by reducing anterior tibial
translation and dynamic valgus (Madigan and Pidcoe, 2003;
McLean et al., 1999).
Wojtys, Wylie, and Huston (1996)
reported the effects of muscle fatigue on neuromuscular function and anterior
tibial translation in healthy knees. They reported that fatigue does alter
the neuromuscular response to anterior tibial translation. Therefore,
fatigue may play a role in the pathomechanics of knee injuries.
Osternig et al., 1995
investigated the co-activation patterns of the biceps femoris muscle between
healthy knees and ACL injured knees. They reported that during knee extension
the hamstrings produced approximately 15 - 40% of the activity in which
they produced during knee flexion. This indicates that the hamstrings
co-contract during extension trying to help stabilize the knee joint.
During fatigue conditions, the ability of the hamstrings to co-contract
may be jeopardized thus placing the knee at risk for injury. Rozzi et
al., 1999
investigated knee joint laxity and neuromuscular characteristics of male
and female soccer and basketball players. They reported that women had
significantly greater knee joint laxity in the sagittal plane. They also
reported that women reached peak hamstring torque quicker than the men.
The authors explained this by speculating that due to the increased sagittal
plane laxity the hamstrings had reacted quicker in order to protect the
knee. They went on to speculate that during a fatigued condition this
neuromuscular adaptation may be compromised and contribute to the increased
ACL injury rate seen in women (Rozzi et al., 1999).
The fifth hypothesis that fatigue would result in greater EMG amplitudes
in both men and women during fatigued landings was not supported by the
group analysis. However, several individual subjects (single subject analysis)
exhibited significant EMG amplitude changes and the direction of these
changes tended to be increases rather than decreases. Additionally, both
female and male subjects showed similar amplitude alterations during the
fatigued condition. The changes in EMG amplitude likely were not revealed
by the group analysis due to the variable response patterns observed among
subjects (see Table 2). The medial
and lateral hamstring muscles were the most often and consistently affected
by the fatiguing exercise. Ten of the twelve significant amplitude changes
observed for the medial and lateral hamstring variables during fatigued
landings were increases, with six of those occurring in female subjects.
Therefore, it seems that an increase in EMG amplitude may indicate fatigue
in the hamstring muscles, which could signify an alteration of the neuromuscular
protection mechanism of the knee joint (Wojtys, Huston et al., 1996).
Chan et al., 2001
reported a significant increase of the electromechanical delay of the
quadriceps muscles, at varying degrees of knee extension, following a
fatigue protocol. The most significant delays were when the knee was extended
90 degrees and 150 degrees (Chan et al., 2001)
This may explain why the majority of non-contact ACL injuries occur when
the knee is at 150 degrees of extension (i.e., 30 degrees of flexion).
A consequence of altered joint proprioception due to fatigue is a decrease
in neuromuscular control (Huston and Wojtys, 1996).
Because of the increased latency periods during the fatigued state, muscles
are not able to respond quickly enough to protect a joint from injury.
Our results do not appear to support a functional difference between men
and women during the fatigued landing activity used in the current study.
The sixth hypothesis that both women and men would have less GRF magnitudes
during the fatigued condition was supported. Both men and women showed
a significant reduction in Pkf during fatigued landings which is consistent
with many studies (Coventry et al., 2006; Horita et al., 1996; Horita et al., 1999; Madigan and Picoe, 2003).
Although sagittal plane knee motion was not an experimental variable in
our study, descriptively we observed that when men were fatigued they
landed with about 5 degrees more knee flexion ROM, while women landed
with about 3 degrees less knee flexion ROM. Additionally, we observed
that knee flexion angle at contact in women was almost 3 degrees greater
during the fatigued landings, whereas the values for men were essentially
unchanged. These descriptive kinematic results are important because sagittal
plane knee angle and ROM during landing provide insight about implied
lower extremity stiffness, which is an important factor in determining
GRF magnitudes (James et al., 2006). However, while both men and women had a significant
decrease in Pkf as a result of the fatiguing exercise, it appears that
their strategies differed. Men appeared to use greater total knee ROM
as a landing strategy, which is similar to observations reported by Orishimo
and Kremenic, 2006, whereas women landed with greater initial knee flexion
at contact. Women may have relied more on ankle or hip strategies, possibly
landing with greater ankle plantar flexion or hip flexion (or a combination
of both) in order to reduce Pkf (Decker et al., 2003;
Madigan and Pidcoe, 2003),
although ankle and knee kinematics were not measured in our study.
Future research should continue to explore fatigue effects, gender differences,
and the role of individual subject characteristics during landing. It
also may be beneficial to examine the influence of different types and
sites of fatigue. Additionally, investigating neuromuscular training as
well as endurance training of the hamstring muscles may be beneficial
for providing insight about the protective benefit of the hamstring muscles
during activity. Improving neuromuscular control of all muscles crossing
the knee joint may help prevent pathological motions believed to be related
to ACL injury risk. Finally, further evaluation of varus motion at the
knee, its relationship to injury risk, and its interaction with valgus
motion may yield further insight into the pathological kinematics that
can occur at the knee during fatigued landings.
|
|