Table 2. Pairwise direct and indirect comparison to assess consistency in the unspecified cognitive impairment analysis by node-splitting model.
| Pairwise |
Direct
Evidence |
Indirect
Evidence |
p-Value |
| C:A |
1.72 |
1.89 |
0.88 |
| D:A |
0.8 |
0.63 |
0.88 |
| B:C |
-1.77 |
-0.56 |
0.41 |
| B:E |
-0.13 |
-1.34 |
0.41 |
| C:D |
1.09 |
0.92 |
0.88 |
| C:F |
0.5 |
1.71 |
0.41 |
| E:F |
0.07 |
-1.14 |
0.41 |
A: Nonexercising control; B: Land-based exercise; C: Aquatic cognitive–motor exercise; D: Aquatic aerobic exercise; E: Aquatic high-intensity interval training; F: Aquatic strength training.