Table S4B. Nonparametric sensitivity analyses (Friedman tests assessed overall condition differences; Wilcoxon signed-rank pairwise comparisons were adjusted using the Holm method).

Domain	Outcome	Unit	n	Friedman χ2	df	Overall p	RIR vs PBT pHolm	VBT vs PBT pHolm	VBT vs RIR pHolm
Training session	Relative peak vertical force	× system weight	18	7.111	2	0.029	0.304	0.062	0.120
Training session	Mean positive vertical impulse	N·s	18	0.333	2	0.846	0.834	0.834	0.145
Training session	Mean repetition duration	s	18	6.778	2	0.034	0.640	0.217	0.042
Training session	Peak vertical force maintenance	%	17	0.824	2	0.662	1.000	1.000	1.000
Training session	Positive impulse maintenance	%	17	0.471	2	0.790	0.918	0.918	0.918
CMJ	Jump height	cm	17	0.353	2	0.838	1.000	1.000	1.000
CMJ	Modified reactive strength index	m·s-1	17	0.471	2	0.790	1.000	1.000	1.000
CMJ	Relative peak positive power	W·kg-1	17	2.471	2	0.291	0.570	0.644	0.570
CMJ	Relative mean propulsive power	W·kg-1	17	0.471	2	0.790	1.000	1.000	1.000
CMJ	Relative propulsive impulse	N·s·kg-1	17	0.118	2	0.943	1.000	1.000	1.000
SJ	Jump height	cm	15	0.933	2	0.627	1.000	1.000	1.000
SJ	Modified reactive strength index	m·s-1	15	0.933	2	0.627	0.991	1.000	1.000
SJ	Relative peak positive power	W·kg-1	15	0.133	2	0.936	1.000	1.000	1.000
SJ	Relative mean propulsive power	W·kg-1	15	0.133	2	0.936	1.000	1.000	1.000
SJ	Relative propulsive impulse	N·s·kg-1	15	0.933	2	0.627	1.000	1.000	1.000

Holm-adjusted p values are reported for pairwise comparisons; values <0.05 are highlighted. Training-session, CMJ, and SJ outcomes are detailed in Tables S1-S3; primary figure panels are shown in Figures 1-3.