Table 3. Pearson’s product-moment coefficients (90% confidence interval) for different methods of quantification of the TL correlated to changes in fitness parameters from T1 to T2.
n sRPEres TL (AU) sRPEmus TL (AU) sumRPEres (AU) sumRPEmus (AU) Training Volume (min)
Δ (%) CMJ 14 -.44 (-.77;-.04) -.20 (-.59;.28) -.43 (-.75;-.04) -.17 (-.59;.26) -.42 (-.75;.11)
Δ (%) CMJAS 14 -.29 (-.69;.26) -.40 (-.69;.00) -.25 (-.68;.27) -.38 (-.68;.02) -.51 (-.80;.02)L
Δ (%) CMJD 13 -.23 (-.61;.25) -.54 (-.87;-.13)L -.27 (-.64;.19) -.61 (-.87;-.24)L -.27 (-.67;.24)
Δ (%) CMJnD 13 -.30 (-.66;.10) -.52 (-.75;-.17)L -.30 (-.66;.10) -.53 (-.76;-.21)L -.39 (-.72;.02)
Δ (%) 5 m 13 -.37 (-.71;.01) -.00 (-.45;.44) -.34 (-.70;.06) .06 (-.43;.49) -.54 (-.82;-.15)L
Δ (%) 15 m 13 -.49 (-.80;-.26) -.15 (-.55;.23) -.38 (-.78;-.09) -.02 (-.48;.37) -.64 (-.83;-.39)L
Δ (%) V3 14 -.30 (-.62;.18) -.45 (-.75;-.02) -.17 (-.52;.27) -.33 (-.68;.12) -.31 (-.70;.23)
Δ (%) Lac12 14 .01 (-.66;.53) -.29 (-.73;.18) .13 (-.56;.61) -.20 (-.67;.27) -.21 (-.67;.29)
Δ (%) Lac13 14 -.36 (-.70;.10) -.57 (-.87;-.09)L -.28 (-.61;.16) -.48 (-.79;.02) -.37 (-.74;.07)
TL: training load; T1: test 1; T2 =test 2; sRPEres TL: respiratory session-rating of perceived exertion; sRPEmus TL: muscular session-rating of perceived exertion; sumRPEres: sum of all respiratory perceived efforts; sumRPEmus: sum of all muscular perceived efforts; CMJ: countermovement jump; CMJAS =arm swing countermovement jump; CMJD: dominant leg countermovement jump; CMJnD: non dominant countermovement jump; V3: running velocity associated with a [La]b of 3 mmol·l−1; La: lactate.