Bullimore, 2008 |
7.6% ± 2.3% higher compared to pure shortening 1.4 ± 1.2% higher compared to isometric reference contraction |
Dependent on shortening distance |
Ettema, 1992 |
2% -16% higher compared to pure shortening contraction |
Dependent on shortening velocity |
Fukutani, 2018 |
3.5% - 7.1% higher compared to isometric reference contraction |
Dependent on shortening distance |
Herzog, 2000 |
No increase compared to pure shortening |
Only depressed state compared to isometric reference contraction |
Lee, 2001 |
4-5% lower compared to isometric reference contraction |
Independent of stretch speed |
Sugi, 1988 |
Lower compared to isometric reference contraction |
Dependent on shortening velocity |