Fortuna, 2017 |
13% -21% lower compared to isometric reference contraction Partly higher compared to pure shortening contraction |
Dependent on the shortening velocity and the delay between the stretch and the shortening |
Fortuna, 2018 |
17% -19% lower compared to isometric reference contraction Higher compared to pure shortening contraction |
Independent of stretch velocity/peak force |
Hahn, 2018 |
8.6% lower compared to isometric reference contraction. Higher compared to pure shortening contraction |
RFE related mechanisms contribute to increased performance following SSCs |
Seiberl, 2015 |
4.5% lower – 10.8% higher compared to isometric reference contraction |
Dependent on shortening amplitude |