| 
  
    | Table 1. The changes (mean±SD) in knee flection range of motion (ROM), pain pressure threshold (PPT), tissue hardness, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC-ISO), and maximal voluntary concentric contraction (MVC-CON) torques before (PRE) and after (POST) the intervention. The two-way ANOVA results (T: time effects, C x T: condition x time interaction effects; P- and F- value) and partial η2 (ηp2) are shown in the right column. |  
    | 
|  | 60-s SS | 60-s FR | 30-s SS+30-s FR | 30-s SS | 30-s FR | ANOVA results POST
 |  
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST | PRE | POST |  | PRE | POST | PRE |  
| Knee flexion ROM (deg) | 134.1 ± 7.0 | 136.9 ± 7.0* | 134.9 ± 5.2 | 138.2 ± 5.9* | 134.3 ± 6.0 | 137.3 ± 5.3* | 133.5 ± 6.0 | 136.5 ± 5.8* | 135.1 ± 5.9 | 137.4 ± 5.7* | T: F = 175.9, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.73 C x T: F = 0.6, p = 0.66, ηp2 = 0.04
 |  
| PPT (kg) | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 5.2 ± 1.5* | 4.3 ± 1.1 | 5.1 ± 1.4* | 4.2 ± 1.3 | 5.6 ± 1.8* | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 5.5 ± 1.5* | 4.3 ± 1.4 | 5.1 ± 1.8* | T: F = 102.8, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.61 C x T: F = 1.4, p = 0.23, ηp2 = 0.08
 |  
| Tissue Hardness (N)
 | 16.6 ± 3.2 | 14.3 ± 2.6* | 17.9 ± 3.4 | 15.7 ± 3.5* | 16.9 ± 3.9 | 14.9 ± 3.6* | 16.9 ± 2.8 | 15.3 ± 2.6* | 18.4 ± 3.5 | 16.2 ± 2.7* | T: F = 216.4, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.77 C x T: F = 0.8, p = 0.53, ηp2 = 0.05
 |  
| MVC-ISO (Nm) | 196.2 ± 37.3 | 185.2 ± 37.5* | 198.7 ± 30.6 | 199.8 ± 38.4 | 200.6 ± 37.4 | 194.79 ± 34.9 | 200.0 ± 27.1 | 188.8 ± 22.8* | 200.1 ± 31.2 | 199.8 ± 29.8 | T: F = 17.0, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.21 C x T: F = 3.9, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.19
 |  
| MVC-CON (Nm) | 180.7 ± 32.0 | 179.7 ± 29.1 | 182.3 ± 28.1 | 184.6 ± 24.4 | 176.3 ± 26.7 | 180.3 ± 29.6 | 181.4 ± 24.9 | 181.1 ± 25.0 | 180.4 ± 28.3 | 181.6 ± 24.9 | T: F = 0.9, p = 0.32, ηp2 = 0.02 C x T: F = 0.5, p = 0.70, ηp2 = 0.03
 |  |  
  
    | *: A significantly (p < 0.05) different from the PRE-value, |  
  
    | SS: static stretching, FR: foam rolling |  |