Table 2.
PEDro scale.
Study
Random allocation
Concealed allocation
Groups similar at baseline
Assessor blinding
Subject blinding
Therapist blinding
Less than 15% dropouts
Intention-to-treat analysis
Between-group statistical comparisons
Point estimates and variability
Eligibility criteria specified
*
Total
Akagi (
2014
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Longo (
2021
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Konrad (2014)
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
6
Konrad (
2017
)
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
5
Konrad (
2019
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
LaRoche (
2006
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Gajdosik (
2007
)
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
6
Brusco (
2019
)
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
5
Marshall (
2011
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Oba (2021)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Kudo (2002)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Ryan (
2008
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Guissard (
2004
)
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
5
Nakao (
2021
)
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
5
Hatano (
2022
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Palmer (
2019
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Rodrigues (
2017
)
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
5
PEDro, Physiotherapy evidence database; 1, one point scored; 0, no points scored;
* Criteria of random allocation was not counted for the total score.