Table 2.
PEDro scale.
Study
Random allocation
Concealed allocation
Groups similar at baseline
Assessor blinding
Participant blinding
Therapist blinding
Less than 15% dropouts
Intention-to-treat analysis
Between-group statistical comparisons
Point estimates and variability
Eligibility criteria specified
*
Total
Barbosa et al. (
2018
)
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
8
Behm et al. (
2011
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
6
Chen et al. (
2018
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Hernández-Trujillo et al. (
2024
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Inoue and Nagano (
2023
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Jung et al. (
2023
)
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
8
Kaneda et al. (
2020
)
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
7
Konrad et al. (
2017
)
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
7
Mizuno (
2017
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
6
Mizuno and Uemura (
2016
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
6
Muanjai and Namsawang (
2023
)
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
7
Murphy et al. (
2010
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
6
Nelson and Kokkonen (
2001
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
6
Oliveira et al. (
2018
)
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
7
Paradisis et al. (
2014
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
6
Ryan et al. (
2014
)
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
6
Wiemann and Hahn (
1997
)
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
7
PEDro, Physiotherapy evidence database; 1, one point scored; 0, no points scored
* Criterion of random allocation was not counted in the total score.