| Description |
Evidence base contains < 30% of all participants from studies rated overall low risk of bias (low quality in seven or more of the ten domains). |
Pooled estimate has substantial or considerable heterogeneity (I2 > 50%), OR there is large variability in point estimates across studies, with estimates varying in direction and little or no overlap of confidence intervals. |
95%CI are excessively wide about the pooled effect estimate, OR evidence base contains few studies with small populations and most provide imprecise estimates. |
Differences in population, exposure, or outcome thought to substantially alter pooled estimate, limiting applicability and generalizability. |
Evidence of reporting deficiencies and publication bias from funnel plot and Egger's test if ≥ 10 studies, OR the relationship has not been repeatedly investigated (< 10 studies). |
Moderate to large pooled effect estimate (OR > 2.5). |
Evidence of a well-defined pattern (linear or otherwise) suggesting an exposure response gradient is present. |