Table 3. Pairwise comparisons of pre-to-post change scores. Outcome Comparison Mean difference Adjusted p Effect size (d) Follow-up test Full back squat 1RM, kg VL10% vs VL40% -8.53 < 0.001 -1.67 Bonferroni VL10% vs FAIL -6.20 0.049 -0.93 Bonferroni VL40% vs FAIL 2.33 1.000 0.36 Bonferroni CMJ height, cm VL10% vs VL40% 0.33 1.000 0.35 Bonferroni VL10% vs FAIL 1.59 < 0.001 1.90 Bonferroni VL40% vs FAIL 1.26 0.004 1.30 Bonferroni SJ height, cm VL10% vs VL40% -2.15 < 0.001 -2.48 Games-Howell VL10% vs FAIL -0.71 0.298 -0.63 Games-Howell VL40% vs FAIL 1.44 0.009 1.20 Games-Howell SBJ distance, cm VL10% vs VL40% 0.67 1.000 0.18 Bonferroni VL10% vs FAIL 5.00 0.012 1.14 Bonferroni VL40% vs FAIL 4.33 0.102 0.81 Bonferroni IMTP net peak force, N VL10% vs VL40% -115.73 < 0.001 -1.67 Games-Howell VL10% vs FAIL -185.93 0.002 -1.48 Games-Howell VL40% vs FAIL -70.20 0.442 -0.55 Games-Howell Mean differences represent change-score contrasts in the listed comparison order. The Kruskal-Wallis sensitivity analysis for full back squat 1RM change scores did not alter interpretation of the primary findings.