Table S5. Pairwise comparisons among training conditions (Pairwise comparisons were adjusted within each outcome using the Holm method). Domain Outcome Unit Contrast n Effect measure Estimate [95% CI] Hedges' gz p value Holm- adjusted p Single session Mean repetition duration s RIR vs PBT 18 Mean difference 0.041 [-0.141, 0.222] 0.133 0.643 0.643 Single session Mean repetition duration s VBT vs PBT 18 Mean difference -0.108 [-0.289, 0.074] -0.352 0.228 0.457 Single session Mean repetition duration s VBT vs RIR 18 Mean difference -0.148 [-0.312, 0.015] -0.537 0.073 0.219 Single session Relative peak vertical force × system weight RIR vs PBT 18 Geometric mean ratio 0.958 [0.833, 1.102] -0.182 0.526 1.000 Single session Relative peak vertical force × system weight VBT vs PBT 18 Geometric mean ratio 0.982 [0.875, 1.103] -0.092 0.749 1.000 Single session Relative peak vertical force × system weight VBT vs RIR 18 Geometric mean ratio 1.025 [0.988, 1.065] 0.396 0.176 0.529 Single session Mean positive vertical impulse N·s RIR vs PBT 18 Geometric mean ratio 0.883 [0.625, 1.246] -0.215 0.455 0.911 Single session Mean positive vertical impulse N·s VBT vs PBT 18 Geometric mean ratio 0.970 [0.709, 1.326] -0.057 0.840 0.911 Single session Mean positive vertical impulse N·s VBT vs RIR 18 Geometric mean ratio 1.099 [0.978, 1.235] 0.479 0.107 0.320 Single session Peak vertical force maintenance % RIR vs PBT 17 Mean difference 0.255 [-3.657, 4.166] 0.041 0.892 1.000 Single session Peak vertical force maintenance % VBT vs PBT 18 Mean difference 0.323 [-4.007, 4.653] 0.045 0.877 1.000 Single session Peak vertical force maintenance % VBT vs RIR 17 Mean difference 0.068 [-6.058, 6.195] 0.008 0.981 1.000 Single session Positive impulse maintenance % RIR vs PBT 17 Mean difference 2.248 [-12.460, 16.956] 0.107 0.751 0.751 Single session Positive impulse maintenance % VBT vs PBT 18 Mean difference -8.172 [-24.399, 8.056] -0.300 0.303 0.720 Single session Positive impulse maintenance % VBT vs RIR 17 Mean difference -10.420 [-28.481, 7.641] -0.335 0.240 0.720 Single session Maximum heart rate beats·min-1 RIR vs PBT 16 Mean difference 0.458 [-8.045, 8.962] 0.054 0.911 1.000 Single session Maximum heart rate beats·min-1 VBT vs PBT 18 Mean difference -1.333 [-6.682, 4.015] -0.149 0.606 1.000 Single session Maximum heart rate beats·min-1 VBT vs RIR 16 Mean difference -1.792 [-8.889, 5.306] -0.133 0.601 1.000 CMJ Jump height cm RIR vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.207 [-2.173, 2.587] 0.053 0.857 1.000 CMJ Jump height cm VBT vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.070 [-1.488, 1.347] -0.030 0.918 1.000 CMJ Jump height cm VBT vs RIR 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.277 [-2.618, 2.064] -0.072 0.806 1.000 CMJ Modified reactive strength index m·s-1 RIR vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.008 [-0.089, 0.073] -0.063 0.831 1.000 CMJ Modified reactive strength index m·s-1 VBT vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.023 [-0.145, 0.099] -0.116 0.695 1.000 CMJ Modified reactive strength index m·s-1 VBT vs RIR 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.015 [-0.080, 0.051] -0.138 0.642 1.000 CMJ Relative peak positive power W·kg-1 RIR vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 1.857 [-5.865, 9.579] 0.148 0.618 0.618 CMJ Relative peak positive power W·kg-1 VBT vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -3.769 [-10.341, 2.802] -0.352 0.243 0.552 CMJ Relative peak positive power W·kg-1 VBT vs RIR 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -5.627 [-14.199, 2.945] -0.403 0.184 0.552 CMJ Relative mean propulsive power W·kg-1 RIR vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.189 [-1.296, 1.675] 0.078 0.791 1.000 CMJ Relative mean propulsive power W·kg-1 VBT vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.201 [-1.238, 1.640] 0.086 0.771 1.000 CMJ Relative mean propulsive power W·kg-1 VBT vs RIR 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.012 [-1.628, 1.652] 0.005 0.988 1.000 CMJ Relative propulsive impulse N·s·kg-1 RIR vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.006 [-0.069, 0.080] 0.048 0.872 1.000 CMJ Relative propulsive impulse N·s·kg-1 VBT vs PBT 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.002 [-0.045, 0.049] 0.024 0.936 1.000 CMJ Relative propulsive impulse N·s·kg-1 VBT vs RIR 17 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.004 [-0.078, 0.070] -0.033 0.911 1.000 SJ Jump height cm RIR vs PBT 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -1.097 [-4.499, 2.305] -0.154 0.505 1.000 SJ Jump height cm VBT vs PBT 15 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 1.389 [-7.011, 9.788] 0.066 0.732 1.000 SJ Jump height cm VBT vs RIR 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 2.486 [-6.408, 11.379] 0.193 0.563 1.000 SJ Modified reactive strength index m·s-1 RIR vs PBT 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.055 [-0.091, 0.202] 0.285 0.437 1.000 SJ Modified reactive strength index m·s-1 VBT vs PBT 15 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.016 [-0.163, 0.195] 0.012 0.854 1.000 SJ Modified reactive strength index m·s-1 VBT vs RIR 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.040 [-0.258, 0.179] -0.111 0.706 1.000 SJ Relative peak positive power W·kg-1 RIR vs PBT 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.438 [-4.232, 3.356] -0.004 0.811 1.000 SJ Relative peak positive power W·kg-1 VBT vs PBT 15 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 1.377 [-4.801, 7.554] 0.086 0.644 1.000 SJ Relative peak positive power W·kg-1 VBT vs RIR 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 1.814 [-5.542, 9.171] 0.164 0.610 1.000 SJ Relative mean propulsive power W·kg-1 RIR vs PBT 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.879 [-2.189, 3.947] 0.208 0.554 1.000 SJ Relative mean propulsive power W·kg-1 VBT vs PBT 15 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.037 [-3.215, 3.289] -0.026 0.981 1.000 SJ Relative mean propulsive power W·kg-1 VBT vs RIR 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.842 [-4.629, 2.945] -0.136 0.645 1.000 SJ Relative propulsive impulse N·s·kg-1 RIR vs PBT 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change -0.040 [-0.150, 0.070] -0.175 0.458 1.000 SJ Relative propulsive impulse N·s·kg-1 VBT vs PBT 15 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.031 [-0.215, 0.278] 0.038 0.793 1.000 SJ Relative propulsive impulse N·s·kg-1 VBT vs RIR 16 Difference in PRE-to-POST change 0.071 [-0.187, 0.329] 0.189 0.570 1.000 For relative peak vertical force and mean positive vertical impulse, estimates are geometric mean ratios; all other training-session estimates are mean differences. CMJ and SJ estimates are between-condition differences in PRE-to-POST change. For mean differences, positive estimates indicate a higher value for the first condition named in the contrast; for ratios, values >1 indicate a higher geometric mean for the first condition. CMJ, countermovement jump; SJ, squat jump; PBT, percentage-based training; RIR, repetitions in reserve; VBT, velocity-based training. pHolm denotes the Holm-adjusted p value.