<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSSM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>J Sports Sci &#x0026; Med</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1303-2968</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Uludag University</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52082/jssm.2023.430</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Research article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comparison of Muscle Activity and Muscle Thickness According to Knee Flexion Angle during Supine Bridge Exercises using the Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver on an Unstable Surface</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Sumin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff001"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<bio>
<p><bold>Sumin KIM</bold></p>
<sec>
<title>Employment</title>
<p>Department of Physical Therapy, Hallym Polytechnic University</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Degree</title>
<p>Ph.D. Candidate (Physical Therapy)</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Research interests</title>
<p>Musculoskeletal system physical therapy, Lymphatic drainage therapy</p>
<p><bold>E-mail:</bold> <email>smgreen7@nate.com</email></p>
</sec>
</bio>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Junhyung</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff002"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<bio>
<p><bold>Junhyung PARK</bold></p>
<sec>
<title>Employment</title>
<p>Department of Physical Therapy, Dongguk University Medical Center</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Degree</title>
<p>Ph.D.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Research interests</title>
<p>Nervous system physical therapy, musculoskeletal system physical therapy, Robot Rehabilitation</p>
<p><bold>E-mail:</bold> <email>potato791018@naver.com</email></p>
</sec>
</bio>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Her</surname><given-names>Jingang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff001"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&#x2709;</xref>
<bio>
<p><bold>Jingang HER</bold></p>
<sec>
<title>Employment</title>
<p>Department of Physical Therapy, Hallym Polytechnic University</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Degree</title>
<p>Ph.D.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Research interests</title>
<p>Sports physical therapy, musculoskeletal physical therapy</p>
<p><bold>E-mail:</bold> <email>jghur7@empas.com</email></p>
</sec>
</bio>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff001"><label>1</label> <institution>Department of Physical Therapy, Hallym Polytechnic University</institution>, <addr-line>Chuncheon-si, Republic of Korea</addr-line></aff>
<aff id="aff002"><label>2</label> <institution>Department of Physical Therapy, Dongguk University Medical Center 27</institution>, <addr-line>Goyang-si, Republic of Korea</addr-line></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">&#x2709; Hallym Polytechnic University, 48, Janghakgil, Dong-Myeon, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<month>09</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>430</fpage>
<lpage>434</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This study evaluated changes in deep trunk muscle thickness and lower extremity muscle activities during bridge exercises with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. Bridge exercises were conducted on an unstable surface at different knee flexion angles (60&#x00BA;, 90&#x00BA; and 120&#x00BA;), with the aim of identifying more effective angles for bridge exercises. This study included 21 healthy adults, aged 20&#x2013;27 years. Biceps femoris (BF), rectus abdominis, and rectus femoris activity was measured using surface electromyography. The thicknesses of the transverse abdominis (TrA), external oblique (EO) and internal oblique (IO) muscles were measured. BF (<italic>p</italic> = 0.000, partial &#x03B7;2 = 0.670) activity increased considerably as the knee flexion angle decreased. TrA (<italic>p</italic> = 0.000, partial &#x03B7;2 = 0.883) and IO (<italic>p</italic> = 0.000, partial &#x03B7;2 = 0.892) thickness significantly increased, while EO (<italic>p</italic> = 0.000, partial &#x03B7;2 = 0.893) thickness decreased as the knee flexion angle decreased. When performing bridge exercises using the abdominal drawing-in maneuver on an unstable surface, the knee flexion angles should be at 120&#x00BA; and 60&#x00BA; to increase trunk stability and lower extremity muscle activity, respectively.</p>
<p><boxed-text position="float">
<caption><title>Key points</title></caption>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Different methods for bridge exercises should be performed depending on the purpose and goals of rehabilitation.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>To increase trunk stability, a knee flexion angle of 120&#x00BA; should be used when performing supine bridge exercises using the abdominal drawing-in maneuver on an unstable surface.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>To increase lower extremity muscle activity, a knee flexion angle of 60&#x00BA; should be used when performing supine bridge exercises using the abdominal drawing-in maneuver on an unstable surface.</p></list-item>
</list>
</boxed-text></p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<title>Key words</title>
<kwd>Electromyography</kwd>
<kwd>deep trunk muscle</kwd>
<kwd>lower extremity muscle</kwd>
<kwd>muscle activity</kwd>
<kwd>muscle thickness</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="21"/>
<page-count count="5"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1-1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Several prior investigations have evaluated the effectiveness of bridge exercises (Dafkou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">2020</xref>; Ho et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">2020</xref>; Lee et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">2015</xref>). One study reported that the abdominal drawing-in maneuver led to increased thickness of the deep transverse abdominis (TrA) muscle, as well as reduced thickness of the rectus abdominis (RA), thus indicating that the maneuver is effective for trunk stabilization (Dafkou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">2020</xref>).</p>
<p>A study that compared various trunk muscle activities during bridge exercise between a stable surface and an unstable surface reported that exercising on an unstable surface increased trunk muscle activity (Lee et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">2015</xref>). However, studies that investigated different knee flexion angles have reported inconsistent results regarding the ideal knee flexion angles for maximal trunk stabilization and lower extremity muscle strengthening (Ho et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">2020</xref>; Lee et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">2015</xref>). Ho et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">2020</xref>) reported that the erector spinae and biceps femoris (BF) muscles had the greatest effect at a knee flexion angle of 40&#x00BA;, and Lee et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">2015</xref>) reported that IO, EO, and RA activities were highest at a knee flexion angle of 120&#x00BA;.</p>
<p>In recent years, several studies have explored the impact of incorporating variables that have been reported as significant during bridge exercises. Takahashi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">2021</xref>) reported that erector spinae activity significantly increased at a knee flexion angle of 90&#x00BA; when unstable surfaces were used. In another study, the activities of the internal oblique (IO) and TrA substantially increased when exercises were performed at 120&#x00BA; knee flexion (Baek et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">2012</xref>).</p>
<p>Therefore, the previously reported variables should be investigated together to determine a more effective supine bridge exercise method. The effects of different knee flexion angles should also be determined. While surface electromyography (EMG) has been used in previous studies (Hirose and Tsuruike, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">2018</xref>; Kim et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">2016</xref>), ultrasound should also be used to complement the shortcomings of surface EMG and examine changes in the thickness of deep muscles.</p>
<p>No prior studies have reported the effects of different knee flexion angles during bridge exercises using abdominal drawing-in that are conducted on an unstable surface. Furthermore, there is a lack of data on the combined use of ultrasound and EMG to examine changes in the thickness of deep trunk muscles and lower extremity muscle activities during bridge exercises. Therefore, this study measured changes in deep trunk muscle and lower extremity muscle activities during bridge exercises with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver that were conducted on an unstable surface at different knee flexion angles, with the aim of identifying more effective angles for supine bridge exercises. We hypothesized that the activity of the muscles and muscle thickness would be different depending on the knee flexion angle during the supine bridge exercise.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-2" sec-type="methods">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="sec2-1">
<title>Participants</title>
<p>Twenty-one healthy adults aged 20&#x2013;27 years with no history of low back pain, surgery, or neurological disease and no pain in the 6 months prior to the study were included. All patients provided informed consent to participate in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hallym University (No. HIRB-2017-065) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2-2">
<title>Procedures<break/>Supine bridge exercises</title>
<p>During the bridge exercises, the abdominal drawing-in maneuver was used to maintain a neutral lumbar posture. The abdominal drawing-in maneuver increases abdominal pressure by pulling the abdominal walls in and contracting the IO and TrA muscles. The participants were taught how to perform the abdominal drawing-in maneuver prior to performing the bridge exercises, and each participant practiced using a biofeedback unit (Chattanooga, Hixson, TN) and ultrasound imaging system (Acuson P300, Siemens Medical Solution, USA) (Hides et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">2007</xref>).</p>
<p>The participants were in a supine position with their neck and head aligned, eyes toward the ceiling, feet shoulder-width apart on the aero-step device (Aero-step XXL, TOGU, Germany) and arms at 30&#x00BA; angles to the sides of the body with their hands on the ground. Prior to the measurement, the participants performed the abdominal drawing-in maneuver while lifting their hips to align their shoulders, hips, and knee joints in a straight line. The physical therapist used a goniometer to mark the points at which the knee flexion angles were 60&#x00BA;, 90&#x00BA; and 120&#x00BA; on the aero-step device (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig001">Figure 1</xref>). The experiment was conducted using a crossover design. When instructed, the participants lifted their hips for 5 seconds while performing the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. Each knee flexion angle was measured three times. To prevent muscle fatigue, the participants took a 1-minute break in between exercises (Baek et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">2012</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2-3">
<title>Muscle activity measurement</title>
<p>The muscle activities were measured using surface EMG (Trigno Wireless EMG system, Delsys, Boston, MA, USA). To minimize skin resistance before attaching the electrodes, the skin at the electrode attachment location was completely shaved and wiped with an alcohol pad to remove as much keratin as possible (Hermens et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">2000</xref>). The surface electrodes were attached to the dominant side RA, rectus femoris (RF) and BF muscles (Delagi and Perotto, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">1980</xref>). The maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was measured for 5 seconds, and the procedure was repeated three times. The average muscle activity value was calculated for a 3-second period, excluding the first and last seconds of the 5-second period. The muscle activity during the bridge exercises was measured and standardized (%MVIC). Raw EMG signals were measured within the 20&#x2013;450 Hz band and were full-wave rectified, high-pass filtered (fourth order, zero phase delay, Butter-worth) to eliminate motion artifacts with a cutoff frequency of 20 Hz and subjected to a 100-millisecond root mean square (RMS) algorithm. The collected data were analyzed using Windows software (EMG Work Acquisition and Analysis, Delsys, USA) (Falla et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">2004</xref>). The reliability of this measurement method is high (ICC = 0.67&#x2013;0.90) (Marshall and Murphy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">2003</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2-4">
<title>Ultrasonography measurement</title>
<p>An ultrasound system (Acuson P300, Siemens Medical Solution, USA) was employed to measure the thickness of the TrA, external oblique (EO) and IO. To ensure consistency of the measurements, a marker was placed on the anterior lateral margin of the abdomen between the right anterior iliac crest and the 11th subcostal angle. The transducer was adjusted laterally and vertically until the lateral abdominal muscles were clearly visible (Whittaker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">2007</xref>). To account for the effects of breathing on muscle thickness while the bridge exercises were conducted, a vertical line was drawn 2.5 cm away from the right edge of the TrA (the muscle-fascia junction) at the completion of expiration (Whittaker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">2008</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig002">Figure 2</xref>). As muscle thickness can vary among individuals, the activation-to-rest ratio (the thickness of the muscle during the bridge exercise relative to its thickness at rest) was calculated to compare muscle activity between the resting and contracting states. The reliability of this measurement method is high (ICC = 0.90, SEM = 0.14) (Mangum et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2-5">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>SPSS software (version 23.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was employed to analyze the collected data. The Kolmogorov&#x2013;Smirnov test was performed to verify that the data were normally distributed. The participants&#x2019; general characteristics and measurements are presented as mean and standard deviation. The muscle activities and activation-to-rest ratio of muscle thickness were compared at three different knee flexion angles using a one-way repeated ANOVA. Post-hoc analyses were performed using the Bonferroni test. The statistical significance level was set at &#x03B1; = 0.05. In addition, to confirm the practical significance, a partial eta-squared effect size was calculated.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-3">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Twenty-one healthy adults (11 males and 10 females) were included (mean age: 23.51 &#x00B1; 3.30 years; mean height: 168.24 &#x00B1; 7.92 cm; mean weight: 60.62 &#x00B1; 9.34 kg). The activities of the RA (p = 0.447, partial &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> = 0.039) and RF (p = 0.275, partial &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> = 0.127) did not significantly differ as the knee flexion angle was changed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table001">Table 1</xref>). The BF (p = 0.000, partial &#x03B7;2 = 0.670) activity considerably increased as the knee flexion angle decreased (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table001">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig003">Figure 3</xref>). The TrA (p = 0.000, partial &#x03B7;2 = 0.883) and IO (p = 0.000, partial &#x03B7;2 = 0.892) thicknesses considerably increased as the knee flexion angle decreased (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table002">Table 2</xref>), while the EO (p = 0.000, partial &#x03B7;2 = 0.893) thickness considerably decreased as the knee flexion angle decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig004">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The BF activity considerably decreased as the knee flexion angle increased, and the IO and TrA thicknesses considerably increased as the knee flexion angle increased. The EO thickness significantly decreased as the knee flexion angle increased.</p>
<p>The BF activity observed in this study was consistent with earlier research that reported that BF activity decreased as the knee flexion angle increased during bridge exercises (Hirose and Tsuruike, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">2018</xref>). The BF generates a strong knee flexion torque during the initial phase of knee flexion movement (Onishi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">2002</xref>), and the knee flexion torque increases as the distance between the feet and pelvis increases during bridge exercises, thereby facilitating posture maintenance (Biscarini et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2017</xref>). As the distance between the legs and trunk increases, the knee flexion angle decreases, the base of support widens and the center of body pressure lowers during the bridge exercise, leading to increased activation of the BF, which is involved in knee flexion and hip extension.</p>
<p>IO and TrA muscle thickness values in the present study were consistent with those of Baek et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">2012</xref>), who reported that changes in IO and TrA muscle thickness were the greatest during bridge exercises with abdominal drawing-in performed at a knee flexion angle of 120&#x00BA;. Furthermore, our results were consistent with the ultrasonographic findings of Dafkou et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">2020</xref>), who reported that TrA thickness increased and RA thickness decreased during bridge exercises using the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. Similarly, Lee et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">2015</xref>) reported that IO activity significantly increased during exercise on an unstable surface compared to that on a stable surface, and Takahashi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">2021</xref>) compared the results of bridge exercises using three different knee flexion angles (90&#x00B0;, 110&#x00B0;, 130&#x00B0;) and two different types of floor surfaces. They reported that the muscle activity of the erector spinae muscle significantly increased when the knee flexion angle was 90&#x00B0; on a completely unstable surface.</p>
<p>During the initial stages of trunk stabilization exercises that are prescribed for low back pain, the drawing-in method, also known as the abdominal hollowing exercise, is often used. The drawing-in method has been reported to be the most effective approach for promoting stabilization of deep abdominal muscles and treating and preventing the recurrence of low back pain, regardless of its cause or outcome (Kim et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">2018</xref>). Furthermore, bridge exercises are typically employed to strengthen back extensor muscles for low back pain (Guthrie et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">2012</xref>). Other studies have used modified bridge exercises during the rehabilitation of athletes with hamstring injuries (Tsaklis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">2015</xref>) and to selectively strengthen hip muscles (Tobey and Mike, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">2018</xref>). Therefore, different methods for bridge exercises should be performed depending on the purpose and goals. A limitation of this study is that the results cannot be generalized to populations beyond healthy men and women aged 20&#x2013;27 years. Future studies should investigate the effects of these bridge exercise conditions in various patient populations. Moreover, interventions should be applied to patients in need of rehabilitation to confirm their effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>A knee flexion angle of 120&#x00BA; should be used during bridge exercises on an unstable surface with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver to enhance trunk stability, and a knee flexion angle of 60&#x00BA; should be used to increase lower extremity muscle activities.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>We thank all the participants in this experiment. We would like to thank Editage (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.editage.co.kr">www.editage.co.kr</ext-link>) for English language editing. The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. No funding was received in support of this work. The authors report there are no competing interests to declare. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The datasets available from the corresponding author, who was an organizer of the study.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baek</surname><given-names>I.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goo</surname> <given-names>B.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>S.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K.H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>) <article-title>Comparison of trunk muscle activation ratios with different knee angles during a bridge exercise with/without an abdominal drawing-in maneuver</article-title>. <source>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>1273</fpage>-<lpage>1276</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.1273</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1589/jpts.24.1273</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Biscarini</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Busti</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Calandra</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Contemori</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>) <article-title>The &#x201C;supine bridge&#x201D; therapeutic exercise: Determination of joint torques by means of biomechanical modeling and technologies</article-title>. <source>Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>1750104</fpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519417501044</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1142/S0219519417501044</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dafkou</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kellis</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellinoudis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahinis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>) <article-title>The effect of additional external resistance on inter-set changes in abdominal muscle thickness during bridging exercise</article-title>. <source>Journal of Sports Science &#x0026; Medicine</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>102</fpage>-<lpage>111</lpage>. <comment>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039025/</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC7039025</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delagi</surname> <given-names>E.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perotto</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>) <source>Anatomic guide for the electromyographer--the limbs</source>. <publisher-name>Charles C. Thomas Publisher</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Falla</surname><given-names>D.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jull</surname> <given-names>G.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hodges</surname><given-names>P.W.</given-names></name></person-group>, (<year>2004</year>) <article-title>Patients with neck pain demonstrate reduced electromyographic activity of the deep cervical flexor muscles during performance of the craniocervical flexion test</article-title>. <source>Spine</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>2108</fpage>-<lpage>2114</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000141170.89317.0e</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.brs.0000141170.89317.0e</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guthrie</surname><given-names>R.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Grindstaff</surname> <given-names>T.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Croy</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ingersoll</surname> <given-names>C.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saliba</surname> <given-names>S.A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>) <article-title>The effect of traditional bridging or suspension-exercise bridging on lateral abdominal thickness in individuals with low back pain</article-title>. <source>Journal of Sport Rehabilitation</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>151</fpage>-<lpage>160</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.21.2.151</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1123/jsr.21.2.151</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hermens</surname><given-names>H.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Freriks</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Disselhorst-Klug</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rau</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>) <article-title>Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures</article-title>. <source>Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>-<lpage>374</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hides</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Miokovic</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Belav&#x00FD;</surname> <given-names>D.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stanton</surname> <given-names>W.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>C.A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>) <article-title>Ultrasound imaging assessment of abdominal muscle function during drawing-in of the abdominal wall: An intrarater reliability study</article-title>. <source>Journal of Orthopaedic &#x0026; Sports Physical Therapy</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>480</fpage>-<lpage>486</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2416</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2519/jospt.2007.2416</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hirose</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsuruike</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>) <article-title>Differences in the electromyographic activity of the hamstring, gluteus maximus, and erector spinae muscles in a variety of kinetic changes</article-title>. <source>The Journal of Strength &#x0026; Conditioning Research</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>3357</fpage>-<lpage>3363</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000002747</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1519/jsc.0000000000002747</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname><given-names>I.M.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>L.P.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>K.O.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luk</surname> <given-names>T.C.J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>) <article-title>Effects of knee flexion angles in supine bridge exercise on trunk and pelvic muscle activity</article-title>. <source>Research in Sports Medicine</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>484</fpage>-<lpage>497</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2020.1777552</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15438627.2020.1777552</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>M.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>E.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>I.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seo</surname> <given-names>E.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>J.S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>) <article-title>Comparison of EMG activity on abdominal muscles during plank exercise with unilateral and bilateral additional isometric hip adduction</article-title>. <source>Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>-<lpage>14</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.05.003</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.05.003</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Y.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>K.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>) <article-title>Self-palpation Feedback for Abdominal Hollowing Exercise</article-title>. <source>The Asian Journal of Kinesiology</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>-<lpage>50</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.15758/ajk.2018.20.2.43</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15758/ajk.2018.20.2.43</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>) <article-title>Effects of bridge exercise performed on an unstable surface on lumbar stabilizing muscles according to the knee angle</article-title>. <source>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2633</fpage>-<lpage>2635</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2633</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1589/jpts.27.2633</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mangum</surname><given-names>L.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutherlin</surname> <given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saliba</surname> <given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hart</surname> <given-names>J.M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>) <article-title>Reliability of ultrasound imaging measures of transverse abdominis and lumbar multifidus in various positions</article-title>. <source>PM &#x0026; R: The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>340</fpage>-<lpage>347</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.015</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.015</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marshall</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>) <article-title>The validity and reliability of surface EMG to assess the neuromuscular response of the abdominal muscles to rapid limb movement</article-title>. <source>Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>477</fpage>-<lpage>489</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00027-0</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00027-0</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Onishi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yagi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oyama</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akasaka</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ihashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Handa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>) <article-title>EMG-angle relationship of the hamstring muscles during maximum knee flexion</article-title>. <source>Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>399</fpage>-<lpage>406</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00033-0</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00033-0</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takahashi</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishiyama</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>) <article-title>Muscle activity during bridge exercises on different types of floor surfaces</article-title>. <source>The Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine</source>, <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>-<lpage>203</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tobey</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mike</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Single-leg glute bridge</article-title>. <source>Strength &#x0026; Conditioning Journal</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>110</fpage>-<lpage>114</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000323</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1519/SSC.0000000000000323</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsaklis</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Malliaropoulos</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mendiguchia</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Korakakis</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsapralis</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pyne</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Malliaras</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>) <article-title>Muscle and intensity based hamstring exercise classification in elite female track and field athletes: Implications for exercise selection during rehabilitation</article-title>. <source>Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>-<lpage>217</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.2147/oajsm.s79189</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/oajsm.s79189</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Whittaker</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>) <article-title>Ultrasound imaging of the lateral abdominal wall muscles in individuals with lumbopelvic pain and signs of concurrent hypocapnia</article-title>. <source>Manual Therapy</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>404</fpage>-<lpage>410</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2007.03.008</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.math.2007.03.008</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Whittaker</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Teyhen</surname> <given-names>D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elliott</surname> <given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Langevin</surname> <given-names>H.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dahl</surname> <given-names>H.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stokes</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>) <article-title>Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: understanding the technology and its applications</article-title>. <source>Journal of Orthopaedic &#x0026; Sports Physical Therapy</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>434</fpage>-<lpage>449</lpage>. <comment>https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2350</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2519/jospt.2007.2350</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="fig001" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption><p>Supine bridge exercises with different knee flexion angles (a: 60&#x00BA; b: 90&#x00BA; c: 120&#x00BA;).</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="jssm-22-430-g001.tif" mime-subtype="tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="fig002" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption><p>Measurement of the transversus abdominis (TrA) thickness using ultrasonography.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="jssm-22-430-g002.tif" mime-subtype="tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="fig003" position="float">
<label>Figure 3.</label>
<caption><p>Percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) and standard deviation for the rectus abdominis (RA), rectus femoris (RF) and biceps femoris (BF) during supine bridge exercises at knee flexion angles of 60&#x00BA;, 90&#x00BA; and 120&#x00BA;. *<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="jssm-22-430-g003.tif" mime-subtype="tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="fig004" position="float">
<label>Figure 4.</label>
<caption><p>Activation/rest muscle thickness ratio of the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and transverse abdominis (TrA) during supine bridge exercises at knee flexion angles of 60&#x00BA;, 90&#x00BA; and 120&#x00BA;. * p &#x003C; 0.05.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="jssm-22-430-g004.tif" mime-subtype="tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="table001" position="float" orientation="portrait">
<label>Table 1.</label>
<caption><p>Relative muscle activities (%MVIC) during bridging exercises.</p></caption>
<table rules="all" frame="box">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Joint angle</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">60&#x00BA;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">90&#x00BA;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">120&#x00BA;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2"><italic>F</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2"><italic>p</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">partial &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Muscle</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean &#x00B1; SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean &#x00B1; SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean &#x00B1; SD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><bold>Rectus abdominis</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">58.58 &#x00B1; 11.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">57.05 &#x00B1; 14.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">56.70 &#x00B1; 15.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.821</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.447</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.039</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><bold>Rectus femoris</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45.30 &#x00B1; 13.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45.56 &#x00B1; 13.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">46.25 &#x00B1; 15.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.385</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.275</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><bold>Biceps femoris</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">69.56 &#x00B1; 17.81 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn001"><bold>a</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45.76 &#x00B1; 13.65 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn002"><bold>b</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">34.36 &#x00B1; 13.41 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn003"><bold>c</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">31.994</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000<sup>*</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.670</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>SD: Standard deviation. MVIC: maximum voluntary isometric contraction.</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn001"><p><sup><bold>a</bold></sup> Significantly (p &#x003C; 0.05) different when compared to 90&#x00BA; and 120&#x00BA;.</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn002"><p><sup><bold>b</bold></sup> Significantly (p &#x003C; 0.05) different when compared to 60&#x00BA;and 120&#x00BA;.</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn003"><p><sup><bold>c</bold></sup> Significantly (p &#x003C; 0.05) different when compared to 60&#x00BA; and 90&#x00BA;. Effect size (partial &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup>): small = 0.01, medium = 0.06, large = 0.14.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="table002" position="float" orientation="portrait">
<label>Table 2.</label>
<caption><p>Ratio of relative muscle thickness at activation and rest during bridging exercises.</p></caption>
<table rules="all" frame="box">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Joint angle</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">60&#x00BA;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">90&#x00BA;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">120&#x00BA;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2"><italic>F</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">p</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">partial &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Muscle</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean &#x00B1; SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean &#x00B1; SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean &#x00B1; SD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><bold>External oblique</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.91 &#x00B1; 0.20 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn004"><bold>a</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.85 &#x00B1; 0.23 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn005"><bold>b</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.84 &#x00B1; 0.22 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn006"><bold>c</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.091</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000<sup>*</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.893</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><bold>Internal oblique</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.27 &#x00B1; 0.30 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn004"><bold>a</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.42 &#x00B1; 0.19 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn005"><bold>b</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.54 &#x00B1; 0.34 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn006"><bold>c</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">61.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000<sup>*</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.892</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><bold>Transverse abdominis</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.31 &#x00B1; 0.27 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn004"><bold>a</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.50 &#x00B1; 0.32 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn005"><bold>b</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.65 &#x00B1; 0.39 <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn006"><bold>c</bold></xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.652</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000<sup>*</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.883</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn004"><p><sup><bold>a</bold></sup> Significantly (p &#x003C; 0.05) different when compared to 90&#x00BA; and 120&#x00BA;.</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn005"><p><sup><bold>b</bold></sup> Significantly (p &#x003C; 0.05) different when compared to 60&#x00BA;and 120&#x00BA;.</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn006"><p><sup><bold>c</bold></sup> Significantly (p &#x003C; 0.05) different when compared to 60&#x00BA; and 90&#x00BA;.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
