Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
3761
Download
19
from September 2014
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ( 2014 ) 13 , 456 - 457

Letter to editor
Stereotypes of Athletes’ Use of Performance Enhancing Products
Carra Johnson1 , Ronald J. Peters2
Author Information
1 Prairie View A&M University, School of Education, TX, USA
2 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, USA

Carra Johnson
✉ PO Box 2876, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
Email: cgjohnson@alumni.usc.edu
Publish Date
Received: 18-02-2014
Accepted: 21-02-2014
Published (online): 01-05-2014
Share this article
 
Dear Editor-in-Chief

A recently published study surveyed cyclists about their use of and attitudes towards performance enhancing products (PEPs) (Kisaalita and Robinson, 2014). Over 60 percent of the cyclists claimed to have used non-banned PEPs while 8 percent claimed to have used banned PEPs. Out of four reasons why the cyclists would not use PEPs, risk to health was rated the most important. When asked to rank incentives for the use of PEPs, the cyclists found winning and maintaining competitiveness with other cyclists significantly more important than obtaining/retaining sponsorship. Ultimately, this study brings to light the stereotype that everything athletes use is for improvement in their sport.

While the responses from the sample that was surveyed provided insight on cyclist’s beliefs about PEP use, the appropriate population was not targeted for this study considering the survey questions. The study was advertised via flyers that were posted throughout a college campus, at bike shops and at cycling races within one community. The only requirement was that the participants had to be 18 years or older, allowing a wide and hardly limited range of individuals to participate. These strategies and requirements are not ideal when trying to attract competitive cyclists; the individuals who would have been exposed to the advertisements would most likely be amateur cyclists who cycle leisurely. No information was provided about the last competitive race that these cyclists had participated in or the highest competitive level they had achieved, so referring to them as competitive cyclists may be farfetched.

The purpose of the study was to examine the attitudes and behaviors towards PEPs amongst a sample of competitive cyclists, and the survey questions were much more applicable to that population. Competitive and non-competitive cyclists do not share the same motives or beliefs in regards to the sport (LaChausse, 2006). The survey asked participants to rate the importance of criteria believed to be significant when choosing whether to use PEPs; the three criteria were “getting caught by the Antidoping Agency (ADA),” “amount of performance improvement,” “risk to health,” and “violation of the spirit of the sport.” They were also asked to rate the importance of factors in choosing a PEP; these factors included “winning,” “obtaining/retaining sponsorship” and “maintaining competitiveness with other cyclists using PEPs.” Being caught by the ADA, maintaining sponsorship and staying competitive against other cyclists using PEPs are concerns that the leisurely cyclist would not have. The risk to health was the highest rated reason to not use PEDs, which may not be an accurate representation of the opinions of competitive cyclists. Similarly, the factors that the subjects considered most important when choosing a PEP included winning and staying competitive. Based on the participation requirements, maintaining sponsorship would probably not apply to this population. However, it would apply to many competitive cyclists and may have been rated with a higher importance when asked of that population. Although the data gathered from this study provides good insight about cyclist’s opinions regarding PEPs, it may not necessarily be relevant to competitive cyclists.

The high use of non-banned PEPs amongst the sample subjects and the non-banned PEPs that they reported using shows the large number of products that are thought to be banned in cycling, whether they actually are or not. There appeared to be no definition of non-banned PEPs in the study or the survey, which warranted a variety of responses of what were perceived to be non-banned PEPs including marijuana, EPO, amphetamines, Viagra, and B complexes (World Anti-Doping Agency, 2013). Not all of the responses were actually non-banned PEPs, and this speaks to the lack of knowledge that there is amongst cyclists regarding what is banned, not banned, and not considered a PEP at all. However, the PEPs that the subjects reported using, and some of the PEPs that are banned by the World Anti Doping Association (WADA), are used recreationally (World Anti-Doping Agency, 2013). The common recreational use of some of the PEPs along with the lack of knowledge about banned substances signals that not all athletes who use PEPs are doing so to enhance athletic performance.

As mentioned previously, this study brings up the stereotype that everything athletes do is for success in their sport (Laure and Binsinger, 2005). There is a big focus on the use of anything that could potentially enhance an athlete’s performance, the problem being that some of these things have multiple uses. Marijuana can be used as a PEP or as a recreational drug (Heishman et al., 1997). Viagra can be used as a PEP or as a counterattack for erectile dysfunction (Petroczi and Naughton, 2010; Mason, 2008). Some energy drinks are considered PEPs due to the substances they contain such as caffeine and amino acids, however they are often consumed simply to quench an individual’s thirst (Reissig et al., 2009; Williams, 2005). Because PEPs can serve multiple purposes, athletes are faced with the dilemma of avoiding PEPs even just for recreational purposes. When they are found using PEPs, it is automatically assumed that they are using it for its purpose as a PEP. However, athletes still have desires and needs similar to every other human being and so they may use certain products for the same reasons that the average population uses them. Unlike the average person, athletes are criticized for this due to the stereotype that they are only interested in performance enhancement in their sport. Kisaalita and Robinson conveyed this successfully in their study, and research with more competitive cyclists must be conducted in the future.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Carra Johnson
Employment: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health
Degree:
Research interests:
E-mail: cgjohnson@alumni.usc.edu
 

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Ronald J. Peters
Employment: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health
Degree:
Research interests:
E-mail:
 
REFERENCES
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Heishman S.J., Arasteh K., Stitzer M.L. (1997) Comparative effects of alcohol and marijuana on mood, memory, and performance. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 58, 93-101.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Kisaalita N.R., Robinson M.E. (2014) Attitudes and motivations of competitive cyclists regarding use of banned and legal performance enhancers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 13, 44-50.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine LaChausse R.G. (2006) Motives of competitive and non-competitive cyclists. Journal of Sport Behavior 29, 304-314.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Laure P., Binsinger C. (2005) Adolecent athletes and the demand and supply of drugs to improve their performance. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 4, 272-277.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Mason C. (2008) Gold medals, vitamin V and miscreant sports. Canadian Medical Association Journal 179, 219-222.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Petroczi A., Naughton D.P. (2010) Potentially fatal new trend in performance enhancement: a cautionary note on nitrite. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 7, -.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Reissig C.J., Strain E.C., Griffiths R.R. (2009) Caffeinated energy drinks—A growing problem. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 99, 1-10.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Williams M. (2005) Dietary supplements and sports performance: Amino acids. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2, 63-67.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine World Anti-Doping Agency (2013) .
 
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
    
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2019 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.