Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
4859
Download
24
from September 2014
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ( 2008 ) 07 , 286 - 291

Research article
Intramuscular Temperature Differences Between the Mid-Point and Peripheral Effective Radiating Area With Ultrasound
Michale G. Miller , Janae R. Longoria, Christopher C. Cheatham, Robert J. Baker, Timothy J. Michael
Author Information
Department of HPER, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

Michale G. Miller
✉ Associate Professor, Western Michigan University, Dept of HPER, 1903 W Michigan Ave, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5426, USA
Email: michael.g.miller@wmich.edu
Publish Date
Received: 01-04-2008
Accepted: 24-04-2008
Published (online): 01-06-2008
Share this article
 
 
ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to determine whether uniform intramuscular heating is achieved throughout a treatment area 2 times the transducer head at both 1 and 3 MHz. Seven male and three female subjects (Age: 23.6 ± 1.0 yrs, Weight: 83.8 ± 23.2 kg, Site Skinfold: 13.9 ± 7.3 mm) underwent two ultrasound treatments (1 and 3 MHz) in the triceps surae muscle group. Thermocouples were inserted at the midpoint and periphery of the treatment area. Ten minute baseline temperatures were recorded followed by a ten minute ultrasound treatment. Two (site) X 10 (time) repeated measures ANOVAs were separately used to determine significance for 1 and 3 MHz treatments. Post-hoc testing was performed using the Bonferroni adjustment. A significant site-by-time interaction was observed for both the 1 and 3 MHz treatments. From baseline to the end of the treatment, temperature increased approximately 2.62°C and 1.58°C for the midpoint and periphery of the 1 MHz treatment and 5.88°C and 3.64°C for the 3 MHz treatment. The differences in temperature suggest that uniform heating does not occur throughout the treatment area.

Key words: Tissue, thermal effects, acoustical.


           Key Points
  • 3 MHz is more effective in raising intramuscular temperature within ERA.
  • Stroke count/rate of transducer may play a factor in heating tissue.
  • Treatment size may alter uniform heating.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
    
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2019 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.