Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
7329
Download
37
from September 2014
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ( 2014 ) 13 , 44 - 50

Research article
Attitudes and Motivations of Competitive Cyclists Regarding Use of Banned and Legal Performance Enhancers
Nkaku R. Kisaalita1,2, Michael E. Robinson1, 
Author Information
1 Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida, USA
2 Medical College of Georgia/Charlie Norwood Veterans Affairs Psychology Residency, USA

Michael E. Robinson
✉ Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida, USA
Email: merobin@ufl.edu
Publish Date
Received: 01-08-2013
Accepted: 02-09-2013
Published (online): 20-01-2014
Share this article
 
 
ABSTRACT

Drug ‘doping’ and the use of banned performance enhancing products (PEPs) remains an issue in virtually all competitive sports despite penal consequences and known health risks. The lines distinguishing “fair” and “unfair” performance enhancement have become increasingly blurred. Few studies have explored how attitudes towards legal performance enhancers (drugs/substances, diet, and equipment modifications) may influence motivations to use banned PEPs. In the present study, 68 competitive cyclists completed a survey examining the importance of choosing banned and non-banned PEPs using World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) criteria. Results showed that over 60 percent of cyclists used non-banned PEPs while 8 percent used banned PEPs. Health was overall the most important factor in choosing a PEP while apprehension by a doping agency was least important. Mixed- model ANOVA analyses revealed that motivations to use banned PEPs were complex, as the importance of health, violating the sprit of the sport, performance improvement, and getting caught were differentially influenced by PEP legality (p < 0.001) and whether a cyclist endorsed non-banned PEP use (p < 0.001). The importance of winning, sponsorship, and maintaining competitiveness did not influence non-banned PEP use (p > 0.05). Our findings illustrate the multifactorial nature of PEP use/doping attitudes and highlight the unique role that “legal” performance enhancement may plays in influencing banned and/or unethical sports behaviors.

Key words: Doping, sports, ethics, health, WADA


           Key Points
  • Use of performance enhancers is high even among non-professional athletes
  • Cyclists overall rated “risk to health” as the most important factor in choosing to use a performance enhancing product.
  • Motivations to use banned performance enhancer are complex and are significantly influenced by whether an athlete utilizes “legal” performance enhancers.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
    
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2019 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.