Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse and Hydration Strategies on Cycling Performance in 30 Km Time Trial: A Randomized, Crossover, Controlled Trial

Amanda M.J. Ferreira, Luiz F. Farias-Junior, Thaynan A. A. Mota, Hassan M. Elsangedy, Aline Marcadenti, Telma M.A.M. Lemos, Alexandre H. Okano, Ana P.T. Fayh


Journal homepage	ISSN: 1303 - 2968

Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

Views

6163

Download

34

Citations in
ScholarGoogle

©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ( 2018 ) 17 , 181 - 187

Research article

Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse and Hydration Strategies on Cycling Performance in 30 Km Time Trial: A Randomized, Crossover, Controlled Trial

Amanda M.J. Ferreira¹, Luiz F. Farias-Junior¹, Thaynan A. A. Mota¹, Hassan M. Elsangedy¹, Aline Marcadenti^2,3,4, Telma M.A.M. Lemos¹, Alexandre H. Okano¹, Ana P.T. Fayh^1,

Publish Date

Received: 16-11-2017
Accepted: 08-02-2018
Published (online): 14-05-2018

Email link to this article

Share this article

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate whether carbohydrate mouth rinse (CMR) improves physical performance of cyclists during a 30-km time trial test and its influence on water balance compared to other strategies of fluid intake. Eleven recreationally trained male cyclists completed a 30 km time trial cycle ergometer under three experimental interventions: (a) CMR, (b) drinking to replace all weight loss (DWL), and (c) drinking “ad libitum” (DAL). Time to complete the 30 km time trial, heart rate, average power, velocity, weight loss, urine color, urine density and pH were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) and generalized estimating equations (GEE) with Bonferroni adjustment (p < 0.05). Time to complete the 30 km time trial was similar among CMR 54.5 ± 2.9 min, DWL 53.6 ± 3.9 min and DAL 54.5 ± 2.5 min (p = 0.13). CMR (1.7 ± 0.4%) elicited similar water loss compared to the DAL (1.4 ± 0.6%) intervention, but it was higher than the DWL intervention (0.6 ± 0.6%) (p < 0.01). CMR did not improve the performance of recreationally trained cyclists in a 30 km time trial test compared to other fluid intake strategies. Furthermore, CMR causes higher water loss compared to DWL intervention.

Key words: Mouth rinsing, endurance performance, exercise, metabolism, nutrition

Key Points

Carbohydrate mouth rinse is not a better performance improvement technique in compared to other hydration strategies in cyclists.

Drinking water ad libitum is an efficient strategy to hydrate, and does not harm sports performance compared to the water recommendations of the American College of Sports Medicine.

The water loss in carbohydrate mouth rinse is similar to strategy ad libitum.

Heart rate did not change throughout 30 km time trial in drinking water ad libitum intervention.

All interventions elicited weight loss after completion of the 30 km time trial.

Home	Issues	About	Authors
Contact	Current	Editorial board	Authors instructions
Email alerts	In Press	Mission	For Reviewers
	Archive	Scope
	Supplements	Statistics
	Most Read Articles
	Most Cited Articles

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.