Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
5640
Download
140
from September 2014
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2005) 04, 583 - 589

Research article
Comparative Kinematic Measures of Treadmill Running with or without Body Weight Support in Runners
Duane Millslagle , Morris Levy, Nick Matack
Author Information
Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Minnesota Duluth, MN, USA

Duane Millslagle
✉ Associate Professor, Health, Physical Education & Recreation Department, SpHC 115, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN 55811, USA
Email: dmillsla@d.umn.edu
Publish Date
Received: 29-06-2005
Accepted: 19-11-2005
Published (online): 01-12-2005
Share this article
 
 
ABSTRACT

Treadmill walking and running using a supportive harness has been used as a training method to rehabilitate injured patients’ walking or running gait. Comparison of full weight support (FWS) and body weight support (BWS) kinematic measures in competitive runners has received little attention. The purpose of this study was to compare selected FWS to BWS kinematic measures in healthy competitive runners. Ten male runners (age = 21.4 ± 1.5 years) with a training regimen averaging 64 km per week at 3.8 m·s-1 participated. All participants ran three 3-minute trials. The randomized trial conditions were: FWS, 20% BWS, and 40% BWS. All conditions were videotaped with 2 cameras and a 21-point, 3-D model was generated for analysis. From the position-time data, cycle length (CL), cycle frequency (CF), time of contact (TC), hip-, knee-, ankle- range of motion in degrees (H-ROM, K-ROM, and A-ROM, respectively), and vertical displacement of the center of mass (COM) were derived and compared. With increasing support conditions, cycle length increased. Cycle frequency, hip and ankle angle ranges, and COM vertical displacement decreased (p < 0.05). However, the ankle angle range of motion varied little between 20% and 40 % BWS (p > 0.05). BWS running produced significant changes in selected kinematic measures. These changes may provide insight into runners’ behavior when using BWS in training or recovery from competition. Additional investigation of BWS training affect with competitive runners would be recommended.

Key words: Partial weight support, locomotion, gait characteristics, running


           Key Points
  • Running kinematics change gradually with increasing levels of body weight support.
  • At constant speed, center of mass vertical displacement, lower leg angular displacement, foot contact time and cycle frequency decrease significantly from FWS to 40S.
  • Harness running can have beneficial effects in healthy runners recovering from intense bouts of exercise.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2020 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.