Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
6187
Download
198
from September 2014
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2007) 06, 126 - 134

Research article
Number of Trials Necessary to Achieve Performance Stability of Selected Ground Reaction Force Variables During Landing
C. Roger James,1 , Joseph A. Herman2, Janet S. Dufek3, Barry T. Bates4
Author Information
1 Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
2 Department of Health, Exercise, and Sport Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
3 Department of Kinesiology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
4 Human Performance & Wellness, Inc., Henderson, Nevada, USA

C. Roger James
✉ Center for Rehabilitation Research, 3601 4th Street, MS 6223, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, 79430-6223 USA
Email: roger.james@ttuhsc.edu
Publish Date
Received: 23-08-2006
Accepted: 26-01-2007
Published (online): 01-03-2007
Share this article
 
 
ABSTRACT

The objectives were to determine the number of trials necessary to achieve performance stability of selected ground reaction force (GRF) variables during landing and to compare two methods of determining stability. Ten subjects divided into two groups each completed a minimum of 20 drop or step-off landings from 0.60 or 0.61 m onto a force platform (1000 Hz). Five vertical GRF variables (first and second peaks, average loading rates to these peaks, and impulse) were quantified during the initial 100 ms post-contact period. Test-retest reliability (stability) was determined using two methods: (1) intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, and (2) sequential averaging analysis. Results of the ICC analysis indicated that an average of four trials (mean 3.8 ± 2.7 Group 1; 3.6 ± 1.7 Group 2) were necessary to achieve maximum ICC values. Maximum ICC values ranged from 0.55 to 0.99 and all were significantly (p < 0. 05) different from zero. Results of the sequential averaging analysis revealed that an average of 12 trials (mean 11.7 ± 3.1 Group 1; 11.5 ± 4.5 Group 2) were necessary to achieve performance stability using criteria previously reported in the literature. Using 10 reference trials, the sequential averaging technique required standard deviation criterion values of 0.60 and 0.49 for Groups 1 and 2, respectively, in order to approximate the ICC results. The results of the study suggest that the ICC might be a less conservative, but more objective method for determining stability, especially when compared to previous applications of the sequential averaging technique. Moreover, criteria for implementing the sequential averaging technique can be adjusted so that results closely approximate the results from ICC. In conclusion, subjects in landing experiments should perform a minimum of four and possibly as many as eight trials to achieve performance stability of selected GRF variables. Researchers should use this information to plan future studies and to report the stability of GRF data in landing experiments.

Key words: Reliability, variability, sequential averaging, intra-class correlation coefficient.


           Key Points
  • The number of trials obtained from a subject in an experiment influences the stability (test-retest reli-ability) and thus validity of the data.
  • One trial might not be representative of a subject's more general performance.
  • Multiple-trial protocols have been recommended by several researchers for a variety of activities, but the number of trials necessary to achieve stabil-ity of ground reaction force variables during land-ing has not been examined.
  • Researchers have used different criteria and meth-odologies for determining stability, making com-parisons among studies and activities difficult.
  • In the current study, test-retest intra-class correla-tion coefficient revealed that on average four trials were necessary for stability, while the more con-servative sequential averaging analysis suggested that 12 trials were necessary for stability.
  • Researchers should be aware of the stability of landing data and collect enough trials from each subject within a single testing session to maximize reliability of their data.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2020 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.