Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
9796
Download
209
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2014) 13, 604 - 609

Research article
Early Adaptations to Six Weeks of Non-Periodized and Periodized Strength Training Regimens in Recreational Males
Eduardo O. Souza1,2, , Carlos Ugrinowitsch1, Valmor Tricoli1, Hamilton Roschel1, Ryan P. Lowery3, André Y. Aihara4, Alberto R.S. Leão4, Jacob M. Wilson3
Author Information
1 Laboratory of Adaptations to Strength Training, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 Department of Physical Education, Paulista University (UNIP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
3 Department of Health Science and Human Performance, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
4 Delboni Auriemo Diagnostic Imaging Sector: a division of DASA, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Eduardo O. Souza
✉ School of Physical Education and Sport; University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Email: desouza.eo@gmail.com
Publish Date
Received: 13-11-2013
Accepted: 20-03-2014
Published (online): 01-09-2014
Share this article
 
 
ABSTRACT

This study compared quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and maximum strength (1RM) after three different short-term strength training (ST) regimens (i.e. non-periodized [NP], traditional-periodization [TP], and undulating-periodization [UP]) matched for volume load in previously untrained individuals. Thirty-one recreationally active males were randomly divided into four groups: NP: n = 9; TP: n = 9; UP: n = 8 and control group (C): n = 5. Experimental groups underwent a 6-week program consisting of two training sessions per week. Muscle strength was assessed at baseline and after the training period. Dominant leg quadriceps CSA was obtained through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 48h after the last training session. Results: The 1RM increased from pre to post only in the NP and UP groups (NP = 17.0 %, p = 0.002; UP = 12.9 %, p = 0.03), respectively. There were no significant differences in 1RM for LP and C groups after 6 weeks (TP = 7.7 %, p = 0.58, C = 1.2 %, p = 1.00). The CSA increased from pre to post in all of the experimental groups (NP = 5.1 %, p = 0.0001; TP = 4.6 %, p = 0.001; UP = 5.2 %, p = 0.0001), with no changes observed in the C group (p = 0.93). Conclusion: Our results suggest that different ST periodization regimens over a short-term (i.e. 6 weeks), volume load equated conditions seem to induce similar hypertrophic responses regardless of the loading scheme employed. In addition, for those recreational males who need to develop muscle strength in the short-term, the training regimen should be designed properly.

Key words: Periodization, exercise prescription, training load, muscle hypertrophy


           Key Points
  • Muscle hypertrophy occurs within six weeks in recreationally active men regardless the ST training regimen employed.
  • When the total volume is similar, training at greater intensities will demonstrate superior gains in the 1RM performance.
  • Some caution should be exercised when interpreting our findings since long-term periodized regimens could produce different training-induced responses.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2020 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.