Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
948
Download
433
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2024) 23, 209 - 218   DOI: https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.209

Research article
The Impact of Personalized versus Standardized Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Training on Health-Related Outcomes and Rate of Responders
Ryan M. Weatherwax1, , Megan C. Nelson2, Lance C. Dalleck3
Author Information
1 Department of Health and Exercise Science, Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR, USA
2 School of Health and Human Performance, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI, USA
3 Recreation, Exercise, and Sport Science Department, Western Colorado University, Gunnison, CO, USA

Ryan M. Weatherwax
✉ Assistant Professor, Health and Exercise Science, Southern Oregon University, USA
Email: weatherwr@sou.edu
Publish Date
Received: 08-01-2024
Accepted: 17-02-2024
Published (online): 01-03-2024
 
 
ABSTRACT

Recent research has shown more favorable training adaptations for inactive adults when cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) exercise is prescribed with the use of ventilatory thresholds compared to percentages of heart rate reserve (HRR). However, there is limited research on changes in health-related outcomes with the use of these CRF methods in combination with muscular fitness exercises. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two training programs for improving CRF, muscular fitness, and cardiometabolic risk factors. Inactive men and women (n=109, aged 49.3±15.5 years) were randomized to a non-exercise control group or one of two exercise training groups. The exercise training groups consisted of 13 weeks of structured exercise with progression using either CRF exercise prescribed with the use of ventilatory thresholds and functional training for muscular fitness (THRESH group) or HRR and traditional muscular fitness training (STND group). After the 13-week protocol, there were significant differences in body weight, body composition, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), VO2max, 5-repetition maximum (RM) bench press, and 5-RM leg press for both treatment groups compared to the control group after controlling for baseline values. However, the THRESH group had significantly more desirable outcomes for VO2max, 5-RM bench press, 5-RM leg press, body composition, and HDL-c when compared to both the STND and control group. Additionally, the proportion of individuals estimated as likely to respond above 3.5 mL·kg-1·min-1 in VO2max (i.e., the minimal clinically important difference) was 76.4%, 20.8%, and 0.13% for the THRESH, STND, and control groups, respectively. While both exercise programs elicited favorable health-related adaptations after 13 weeks, these results suggest that a personalized program with exercise prescribed based on ventilatory threshold and with the use of functional muscular fitness training may yield greater training adaptations.

Key words: Exercise training, VOmax, muscular fitness, training responsiveness


           Key Points
  • The use of ventilatory thresholds as anchors for cardiorespiratory fitness exercise combined with functional muscular fitness training yielded more favorable health-related outcomes compared to other groups.
  • The proportion of participants estimated as likely responders was considerably greater in the personalized group compared to the other groups.
  • Both personalized and standardized exercise programs had more favorable outcomes compared to the control group – exercise is better than no exercise for improving various health-related outcomes.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2024 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.