Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
3683
Download
1230
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2024) 23, 559 - 570   DOI: https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.559

Research article
The Release of Lipolytic Hormones during Various High-Intensity Interval and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Regimens and Their Effects on Fat Loss
Xiangui Zhu1, Jiao Jiao2,3, Yu Liu1, Hong Li1, Haifeng Zhang1,4,   
Author Information
1 Physical Education College, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China
2 Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
3 Dr. Stephen Hui Research Centre for Physical Recreation and Wellness, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
4 Hebei Provincial Key Lab of Measurement and Evaluation in Human Movement and Bio-Information, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China

Haifeng Zhang
✉ Physical Education College, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China
Email: zhanghaifeng@hebtu.edu.cn
Publish Date
Received: 30-04-2024
Accepted: 04-07-2024
Published (online): 01-09-2024
 
ABSTRACT

To investigate the release of lipolytic hormones during various high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), and their effects on fat loss. 39 young women categorized as obese (with a body fat percentage (BFP) ≥30%) were randomly allocated to one of the following groups: all-out sprint interval training (SIT, n =10); supramaximal HIIT (HIIT120, 120%V̇O2peak, n = 10); HIIT (HIIT90, 90%V̇O2peak, n = 10), or MICT, (60%V̇O2peak, n = 9) for a twelve-week observation period consisting of 3 to 4 exercise sessions per week. Serum epinephrine (EPI) and growth hormone (GH) were measured during the 1st, 20th, and 44th training sessions. Body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), whole-body fat mass (FM) and BFP were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Following the 1st and 20th sessions, significant increases in EPI (p < 0.05) were observed post-exercise in HIIT120 and HIIT90, but not in SIT and MICT. In the 44th session, the increased EPI was found in SIT, HIIT120, and HIIT90, but not in MICT (p < 0.05). For the GH, a significant increase was observed post-exercise in all groups in the three sessions. The increased EPI and GH returned to baselines 3 hours post-exercise. After the 12-week intervention, significant reductions in FM and BFP were found in all groups, while reductions in BW and BMI were only found in the SIT and HIIT groups. Greater reductions in FM and BFP, in comparison to MICT, were observed in the SIT and HIIT groups (p < 0.05). 12-week SIT, HIIT120, and HIIT90, in comparison to MICT, were more efficacious in fat reduction in obese women, partly benefiting from the greater release of lipolytic hormones during training sessions.

Key words: High-intensity interval training, moderate-intensity continuous training, exercise intensity, lipolytic hormones, obesity


           Key Points
  • After the 12-week intervention, increased levels of EPI were observed in the acute session following the completion of some varieties of HIIT (excluding MICT).
  • Significant increases in GH were observed post-exercise in various HIIT and MICT during the three acute sessions.
  • Various HIIT resulted in greater reductions of whole-body fat mass and body fat percentage (when compared to MICT).

INTRODUCTION

Contemporary research has developed an increased interest in the employment of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) as a time-efficient method for promoting fat loss among individuals identified as obese (Yin et al., 2024; Couvert et al., 2024). Research has demonstrated that, when compared with the same volume of traditional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), HIIT can effectively reduce overall body fat (Sultana et al., 2019; Maillard et al., 2016; Wewege et al., 2017) and is even more effective in reducing visceral fat (Maillard et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2015; 2021).

During HIIT, carbohydrates are the primary fuel source for muscles; fat utilization is minimized because the body relies on carbohydrates as the primary source of energy when exercise intensity exceeds 70% of the maximum oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) (Hargreaves and Spriet, 2020). However, the energy expenditure during exercise is not confined to the exercise period alone and occurs throughout the post-exercise period. A meaningful quantity of energy is consumed in the period following physical activity (known as Excess Post-exercise Oxygen Consumption (EPOC) and fat is the primary substrate utilized throughout the EPOC process (Moniz et al., 2020). EPOC is directly correlated with the increased secretion of lipolytic hormone (Borsheim and Bahr, 2003), therefore, HIIT can stimulate the body to release additional lipolytic hormones, enhance EPOC, and consume additional fat which explains one of the mechanisms underlying the fat-reducing effects of HIIT. However, it raises the question of whether the same mechanism applies when comparing HIIT of different intensities with MICT protocols.

Lipolytic hormones, such as epinephrine (EPI) and growth hormone (GH), play a key role in promoting the breakdown of triglycerides by regulating hormone-sensitive lipase and increasing fat consumption (Hansen et al., 2012). Previous studies have demonstrated that the secretion of lipolytic hormones during endurance exercise is directly proportional to exercise intensity (Hansen et al., 2012; Pritzlaff et al., 1999; 2000). Peake et al. (2014) conducted a study comparing HIIT (10 sets of 4-minute exercise at 80%V̇O2max intensity with 2-minute intervals) and MICT (continuous training at 65%V̇O2max with the same energy expenditure). The results made notable observations: firstly, GH levels were significantly elevated after HIIT and MICT sessions, and secondly, the levels of EPI only increased after HIIT (and not MICT). Moreover, GH remained elevated for 2 hours during the recovery period in the HIIT group, compared to only 1 hour in the MICT group (Peake et al., 2014) implying that the secretion of lipolytic hormones is greater and more prolonged with higher-intensity exercise; however, a lack of certainty remains regarding whether this model applies to obese individuals and further study is recommended.

Apart from exercise intensity, the number of intervals and overall duration of exercise are the major influencing factors regarding lipolytic hormones (Jones, 2023; Gallo et al., 2024; Tschakert et al., 2022). Currently, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) recommends that adults engage in prolonged exercise for 60 minutes at a moderate intensity, five days per week (ACSM, 2021). Although this recommendation may not be practical or suitable for all individuals (especially those who are inactive or obese). HIIT, which provides short durations of higher-intensity exercise, could be an accessible alternative due to its prominent impact on metabolic responses via exercise intensity (Wewege et al., 2017; Sultana et al., 2019; Sabag et al., 2022a). However, each individual’s physiological resilience or exercise durability varies (Jones, 2023; Gallo et al., 2024; Tschakert et al., 2022), making it unclear whether HIIT programs (with different durations and numbers of intervals) have the same effect on lipolytic hormone responses as MICT (with longer durations but the same total exercise volume as HIIT). This uncertainty also extends to whether these effects apply to obese participants.

None of the current literature has established if obese individuals secrete increased amounts of lipolytic hormones during HIIT when compared to MICT; therefore, additional research is required to explore the impact of different intensities of HIIT on the release of lipolytic hormones when compared with MICT. Specifically, it is important to investigate whether the level of lipolytic hormones released during acute exercise is higher in HIIT (compared to MICT) in obese individuals and whether long-term adherence to a HIIT protocol leads to greater fat loss. To establish the role of lipolytic hormones in HIIT-induced fat reduction, this study will compare the release of these hormones following three representative HIIT protocols (90%V̇O2max; 120%V̇O2max; and all-out sprint intensity) with the levels recorded following MICT. This study hypothesizes that all three HIIT protocols will exhibit a greater fat-reducing effect than MICT which is attributed to the increased elevation of lipolytic hormones associated with acute high-intensity exercise.

METHODS

Participants

As outlined by Zhang et al. (2021), the sample size was estimated based on an effect size of 0.5, an α-level of 0.05 (ηρ2 = 0.20) and a power of 80%. G*Power was utilized to identify any possible difference in serum EPI between the groups and indicated that 8 participants per group were necessary; therefore, considering a potential dropout rate of 20%, a sample size of 12 participants per group was selected and, in total, sixty obese young women were recruited (see Figure 1). The participants had not experienced significant fluctuations in their body weight (±2kg) in the three months preceding their selection, had not trained, had no history of hormone metabolism, and had no medical reason not to participate in vigorous exercise. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Hebei Normal University for the Use of Human & Animal Subjects in Research and the study was performed per the Declaration of Helsinki. Each participant completed and signed the consent form and written notice to signify their agreement to participate in this research.

Study design

The subjects were randomly divided into 5 cohorts (consisting of 12 participants per group): sprint interval training group (SIT, 6 seconds of exercise followed by 9 seconds of rest, 40 sets); 120% maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) HIIT group (HIIT120, 60 seconds of exercise followed by 90 seconds of rest, 16-21 sets); 90%V̇O2max HIIT group (HIIT90, 240 seconds of exercise followed by 180 seconds of rest, 5-7 sets); 60%V̇O2max MICT group (MICT, continuous exercise for 51-61minutes); and the control group without training (CON). The exercise interventions spanned 12 weeks and consisted of 44 sessions (including 3 acute exercise tests): for the first 4 weeks, the participants exercised 3 times a week and for each week thereafter, they trained 4 times a week. The acute exercise tests were conducted in the early (1st exercise), middle (20th exercise), and late stages (44th exercise) of the 12-week training period. At the acute exercise tests, median cubital vein blood was collected before, immediately after, and 3 hours after exercise. The EPI and GH levels were tested to observe the effect of HIIT on lipolytic hormones in obese young women. For three weeks before testing, and throughout the 12-week exercise period, the participants’ habitual dietary calories and physical activity were monitored and recorded. Additionally, body weight, BMI, body fat, body fat percentage, and body muscle of the participants were tested before and after the 12-week intervention. The technical route of the research scheme is shown in Figure 2.

Training methods

A progressively rising load exhaustion study was conducted via the use of an aerobic cycle ergometer and a gas metabolism analyzer. The exhaustion study began at 50W and increased by 20W every 2 minutes to measure V̇O2max (Quark-PFT-ergo, COSMED, Italy). The assessment concluded when one of the following criteria was met: (i) the increase of exercise intensity resulted in plateaued oxygen uptake; (ii) the respiratory quotient exceeded 1.15; (iii) RPE = 20 or the participant was unable to maintain the required level; or (iv) in the event of significant cardiac or respiratory distress. Following completion of the test, the mean oxygen uptake value in the 30 seconds following load completion was deemed to be the V̇O2max. By recording the corresponding value of each intensity power and its average oxygen uptake within the last 30 seconds, a scatter plot was generated to acquire the formula for exercise intensity-oxygen uptake linear regression and calculate the corresponding 120%, 90% and 60%V̇O2max exercise intensity. The exercise duration necessary to accomplish mechanical work to 200KJ was computed via the following formula: Work (KJ) = Work (J) ×1000 = Exercise power (watt) × Exercise time (s) = Exercise power (watt) × Exercise time (min) ×60. The measurement of V̇O2max was conducted at 4-weekly intervals over a period of 12 weeks to modify the intensities of the HIIT120, HIIT90 and MICT cohorts and ensure the participants maintained the requisite exercise intensity.

Figure 3 contains the training protocols for the high-intensity interval training (HIIT) cohorts (SIT, HIIT120 and HIIT90 respectively) alongside those of the MICT group. Those assigned SIT undertook 40 sets of 6-second maximum intensity sprints followed by 9-second intervals on the anaerobic cycle ergometer (Monark 894E, Sweden) for a total exercise duration of four minutes. This period equates to a work/rest recovery period of 6/9 s or a 1 to 1.5 work recovery ratio. The heart rate (HR, Polar, Finland), rating of perceived exertion (RPE, Borg scale 6-20, 1973), and peak pedaling power were documented every fifth exercise set. The initial exercise load comprised of 1kg and once the participants had concluded the exercise and their HR and RPE had diminished, the resistance was progressively raised to 3kg. The remaining three cohorts (HIIT120, HIIT90, and MICT) utilized the aerobic cycle ergometer (Monark 839E, Sweden) to accomplish mechanical work to 200 KJ. The protocols were as follows: (i) the HIIT120 subjects were active for 1 minutes to 120%V̇O2max intensity, rested for 1.5 minutes, and the exercise was repeated 16-21 times to give an exercise component duration of 16-21 minutes which equates to a work/rest recovery period of 1/1.5 minutes or a 1 to 1.5 work recovery ratio; (ii) the HIIT90 subjects were active for 4 minutes at an intensity of 90%V̇O2max, rested for 3 mins, and the exercise was repeated 5-7 times resulting in a complete exercise duration of approximately 20-28 minutes which equates to a work/rest recovery period of 4/3 minutes or a 1 to 0.75 work recovery ratio; (iii) the MICT subjects exercised continuously for approximately 51-61 minutes at an intensity of 60%V̇O2max. For the HIIT120 and HIIT90 cohorts, assessments of HR and RPE were conducted and documented before and after each session; for the MICT group, the same assessments were conducted at 5-minute intervals.

Physical activity and dietary assessment

Throughout the 3-week pre-intervention and 12-week intervention phases, the participants adopted a daily dietary approach to self-report physical activity and to estimate their habitual energy expenditure. Total energy expenditure, measured in metabolic equivalents (METs)·hr·wk–1, was calculated using reported MET values from the Compendium of Physical Activities combined with the weekly activity recordings. To monitor each participant’s caloric intake, their daily diets were meticulously recorded throughout the pre-intervention and intervention periods per the guidelines of the NRISM Sports Nutrition Centre (National Research Institute of Sports Medicine, China) for dietary monitoring. Dietary records and the corresponding energy intake were analyzed using the NRISM dietary and nutritional analysis system (version 3.1) which was specifically designed for Chinese athletes and the general population. Weekly consultations with a dietitian were conducted to ensure consistent adherence to caloric intake guidelines and to mitigate deviations.

Outcome Measures

Lipolysis hormones

Median cubital vein blood was collected before, immediately after, and 3 hours post-exercise (following the earlier (1st), middle (20th), and late exercise sets (44th)). The timing of the post-exercise blood samples followed previous research which determined that peak levels of lipolytic hormones (EPI and GH) occur after exercise and that GH levels remain elevated for two hours following the cessation of exercise (Peake et al., 2014); therefore, this research collected blood samples from three hours after exercise to observe the duration of elevated lipolytic hormone levels. The collected data will provide valuable insights regarding the release of lipolytic hormones during high-intensity exercise and the potential fat-reducing effects of HIIT which may be attributed to the cumulative release of lipolytic hormones during extended intensive HIIT sessions.

The median cubital vein blood samples were refrigerated at 4 °C for 30 minutes then centrifuged for 15 minutes at a speed of 3000rpm. The resultant supernatant was refrigerated at -80 °C and the concentration of lipolytic hormones (EPI and GH) was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. To ensure consistency and accuracy, the same technician performed each test. The EPI testing kits were manufactured by Wuhan Huamei Bioengineering Co., Ltd., and those for GH testing were supplied by RayBiotech (United States). The kits’ assay coefficients of variation were 3.48% (EPI), and 4.65% (GH).

Body composition

A bioelectric impedance assessment (Jawon Medical, X-Scan plus II, Korea) was utilized to determine the subjects’ body mass (BM), body mass index (BMI), body fat mass (BFM), body fat percentage (BFP), and body muscle mass (BMM). The participants were requested to wear tightly fitting clothes and not wear any metal (such as jewelry and piercings). When assessing body fat, the X-Scan plus II has a retest coefficient of variation of 1.3% and the equation used to compute BMI (kg/m2) is weight/(height)2.

Statistical analysis

SPSS software (version 26.0) was employed to analyze the data which were given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Shapiro-Wilk test of normality was conducted to assess the normal distribution of data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to analyze the results before the intervention for the individual cohorts. Repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to assess any variances in body composition (5 cohorts*2 time points) and lipolytic hormones (4 cohorts*3 time points) and to examine the interaction, time, and group effects. Upon recognition of a significant interaction, the Newman-Keuls test can be utilized to analyze and compare the simple effect; if the interaction effect is not significant, the main effect is analyzed. The results are considered to be statistically significant if p values of < 0.05 and highly significant if p < 0.01.

RESULTS

Participants

To ensure the robustness of its findings, this research adhered rigidly to the pre-determined exercise protocol. Each subject participated in a 12-week exercise intervention which incorporated 3 sessions of acute exercise to assess any fluctuations in the participants’ lipolytic hormone levels. A total of 48 participants were deemed to have completed the study (representing an 80% completion rate) and were distributed across the cohorts in the following manner: SIT (n = 10), HIIT120 (n = 10), HIIT90 (n = 10), MICT (n = 9), and CON (n = 9).

Training monitoring metrics

The parameters noted for each exercise cohort during the intervention (mechanical work, exercise power, exercise time, HR, and RPE) are displayed in Table 1. All exercise groups (except the SIT cohort) achieved mechanical work of 200 KJ which indicates a lower exercise volume in the SIT group. Despite this, the exercise duration remained constant at 4 minutes; however, the resistance on the anaerobic power bike gradually intensified, increasing the work performed by the SIT group, while the other groups maintained a consistent work level with decreasing duration. Throughout the training period, the HIIT120, HIIT90 and MICT cohorts progressively increased their exercise power resulting in reduced exercise duration over time; however, their work recovery ratios remained static. The HIIT groups displayed a progressive decrease in average HR and an increase in their RPE during training which were not observed in the MICT cohort.

Changes in the levels of lipolysis hormones

The levels of lipolysis hormones (EPI and GH) at baseline (1st), mid (20th), and late (44th) phases of exercise which were measured before, directly following, and 3 hours post-exercise are presented in Figure 4. GH titers were enhanced at all exercise phases by the three forms of HIIT and the MICT, with no variations identified between the groups (p > 0.05) (see Figure 4).

In the HIIT120 and HIIT90 cohorts, elevated levels of EPI were observed in the three training phases directly following exercise when compared to baseline. Within the SIT cohort, that EPI was not elevated (when measured directly following exercise in the early and mid-training assessments); however, they had increased by the latter part of the intervention (12 weeks). No increase in EPI titers was observed following acute MICT in any of the three training periods. Repeated measures of ANOVA demonstrated that in the early training phase, the cohort triad performing HIIT was superior to the group undertaking MICT in achieving higher EPI levels (interaction effect, p < 0.05). At the mid-point of training, there was no difference between HIIT and MICT on EPI (interaction effect, p = 0.112). However, in the later phase of the exercise program, HIIT was more effective than MICT in increasing EPI concentrations (interaction effect, p < 0.05). The EPI differences between the three cohorts performing HIIT before, directly following, and 3 hours post-exercise failed to reach significance (p > 0.05) (see Figure 4).

Changes in body composition and aerobic capacity

The participants within each cohort demonstrated no variations in baseline age, height, BM, BMI, BFM, BFP, BMM and V̇O2max (see Figure 5 and Table 2). In each of the HIIT groups, body weight and BMI were reduced following the 12-week exercise program (p < 0.01); no changes were seen in the MICT and CON groups. After the intervention, BFM and BFP were reduced in all intervention cohorts but to a greater extent in the three groups performing HIIT rather than MICT (p < 0.05). No differences in BFM and BFP between the HIIT cohorts were observed. The BMM of each group demonstrated no significant change following the 12-week intervention period. Following the training period, V̇O2max was elevated in all the groups: a superior effect was observed among the HIIT120 and HIIT90 cohorts compared to the MICT group (p < 0.05) while the effect of SIT and MICT on V̇O2max was equivalent.

DISCUSSION

This research was designed and implemented to compare the release of lipolytic hormones following high-intensity interval training or continuous exercise and the long-term effects of lipolytic hormones on fat loss. Its results indicate that serum lipolytic hormones (EPI) were elevated in young, obese females in the early and mid-points of the training intervention only in the cohorts conducting HIIT120 and HIIT90; however, in the late training phase, lipolytic hormone releases are consistent across all three of the HIIT cohorts. Of the lipolytic hormones evaluated at the three time points, MICT only induced a rise in GH levels, but this impact was similar to that observed among participants in the three HIIT cohorts. HIIT promotes the release of hormones at a higher rate than MICT which partially explains the efficiency advantage of this form of exercise in reducing fat. However, although the HIIT cohorts demonstrated similar levels of fat reduction, their hormone release levels are different which implies that lipolytic hormones may not be a dominant/unique factor in HIIT-induced fat reduction.

Currently, there is no standardized definition of HIIT protocol (Cao et al., 2021; Maillard et al., 2016; Sabag et al. 2022b; Sultana et al., 2019). Based on exercise intensity and energy systems, HIIT can be classified into the following three forms: HIIT near V̇O2max intensity (usually at 90% V̇O2max, primarily utilizing aerobic oxidation for energy supply); HIIT at or above V̇O2max intensity (with anaerobic metabolism contributing to approximately 50% of the total energy supply) (MacInnis et al., 2017; Scott et al., 2024); and repeated intervals of all-out sprints at even higher exercise intensity (where using glycolysis predominates as the main energy source) (Buchheit et al., 2013). Therefore, in this study, four commonly used and classic protocols were employed, with various exercise intensities: SIT, 120V̇O2max, 90V̇O2max and 60%V̇O2max.

Each participant was closely monitored by the experimenters throughout each training session and strictly followed the exercise protocols. Heart rate and RPE were continuously monitored during exercise to ensure that the exercise intensity for the obese population adhered to the study design and to ensure their safety. In this study, the exercise protocols for each group were set to complete 200KJ of mechanical work based on previous research (Nie et al., 2019). The moderate-intensity MICT group had an exercise duration of approximately 60 minutes to achieve the 200KJ mechanical work, which aligns with the exercise prescription recommendations for the obese population by the ACSM (ACSM, 2021). Although the HIIT120 and HIIT90, do not adhere to the principle of increasing training load, the total workload had remained at 200KJ, as the same as MICT. The total work was calculated as the average power multiplied by the total time. The average power differed among the two HIIT groups and the MICT group (HIIT120 - 48%V̇O2max; HIIT90 - 51.4%V̇O2max; MICT - 60%V̇O2max), and the average power can influence acute cardiorespiratory responses (HR and V̇O2) during exercise with fluctuations in average power (Tremblay et al., 2005). Therefore, under the same total work, the HIIT exercise prescriptions in this study, with personalized adjustments on lower average exercise power and exercise duration/number of intervals, and have the time-saving characteristics, may be more suitable for exercise-based weight loss interventions in the obese population.

Effects of MICT and HIIT on lipolytic hormones

The impact of HIIT on fat reduction may be closely related to its influence on lipolytic hormone secretion: exercise acts as a primary trigger for their release which, in turn, induces higher rates of lipid breakdown (Muscella et al., 2020). Previous studies have shown that individuals with obesity and those without obesity have diverse responses to lipolytic hormones following MICT: individuals not classified as obese experience elevated levels of EPI and GH when compared to those classified as obese (Koppo et al., 2010; Weltman et al., 2008), which may be attributed to the lower level of sympathetic excitability of obese people (Hansen et al., 2012). In this study, the EPI of obese young women in the MICT group did not increase following three acute interventions which can be attributed to the fact that the subjects of this study are obese individuals. However, in the HIIT120 and HIIT90 groups, EPI immediately increased following the 1st and 20th exercises. A study conducted by Peake et al. (2014) found that HIIT (80%V̇O2max) increased EPI release levels whereas they remained unaffected by MICT (65%V̇O2max).

Furthermore, in the current study, the SIT program led to an increase in EPI following exercise only during the post-training phase, but not in the pre-and mid-training stages. This increase can be attributed to the fact that the initial resistance during the SIT program started at 1kg and incrementally increased to 3 kg by the later stages, resulting in a lower overall workload in the pre-and mid-training stages. Additionally, the absolute intensity and pure exercise time were relatively low during the pre-and mid-training stages (4 minutes) which may have been insufficient to induce an increase in EPI. This finding may reflect the lower volume of exercise (lower load and/or short exercise time) in the SIT group, as well as the attenuated release of lipolytic hormones seen in obesity (Hansen et al., 2012) and this effect may be mitigated following 12 weeks of fat loss. EPI is secreted by the adrenal medulla which is dominated by the sympathetic nerve; therefore, its secretion will increase alongside any increase in intensity (Verboven et al., 2018). However, its highest intensity was less than the 100%V̇O2max threshold (Pritzlaff et al., 2000) and the EPI release may plateau at the point where the exercise intensity nears or is greater than 100%V̇O2max. This factor is crucial when considering the fat reduction noted within the HIIT cohorts in the current study and may explain why the varying intensity of HIIT has equivalent influences on the reduction of fat: HIIT will lead to a higher degree of activation of the sympathetic nervous system (Thompson et al., 2012), which may explain the increase of EPI in obese people in this study.

Obesity inhibits the sympathetic excitation provided by MICT; therefore, this form of exercise does not reach the exercise intensity threshold required to stimulate a significant release of EPI. In this study, the MICT cohort did not exhibit any significant increase in EPI which may also correlate with exercise duration. Several studies have noted the existence of a threshold duration for hormone response to moderate-intensity exercise (Viru, 1992; Tremblay et al., 2005); it is conceivable that the exercise duration adopted by this study failed to attain (or exceed) the required threshold duration resulting in the absence of an increase in EPI levels. Based on the aforementioned observations, it can be inferred that, in contrast with MICT, HIIT can trigger a higher level of EPI liberation into the serum of young females with obesity, and that serum levels are comparable regardless of the HIIT protocol followed.

Epinephrine (EPI) serves as a hormone indicator of training adaptation and can reflect changes in overall workload. In this study, EPI levels did not decrease in each groups during the early, middle, and late stages of training (except for an elevation observed in the SIT group during the late stage) and the exercise power and RPE gradually increased to attain the training principle of relative exercise intensity based on the percentage of V̇O2max (Granata et al., 2018). The purpose of this study was to reduce exercise time to address the issue of time constraints preventing individuals from engaging in physical activity (rather than enhancing exercise performance or outcomes via overload training principles). If future studies are conducted with different goals unrelated to timesaving, attention should be paid to the principle of progressive overload in training load and the potential impact of exercise duration on weight loss and metabolism.

When considering GH of the lipolytic hormone, the increases in GH levels were observed to be comparable across all three forms of HIIT and MICT (in the 1st, 20th, and 44th acute exercise interventions). Sasaki et al. (2014) demonstrated that analogous GH increases were observed following HIIT and MICT in sedentary males before and after a 4-week exercise program which is in alignment with the present data. It could be hypothesized that HIIT and MICT can lead to a comparable rise in circulating GH titers, which is in keeping with the hypothesis that both can promote fat loss as demonstrated. In another study (Peake et al., 2014), elevations in GH levels following HIIT and MICT have been established, although the former leads to a more enduring GH rise. These findings are not in agreement with the currently presented data and may be attributed to the inhibition of GH release during exercise in individuals with obesity (Hansen et al., 2012, Weltman et al., 2008).

In contrast with MICT, HIIT can initiate the release of specific lipolytic hormones such as EPI among young females with obesity; however, when analyzing other lipolytic endocrine components (such as GH), the two exercise paradigms exhibit comparable results. It should be noted that the release of the lipolytic hormone following acute HIIT may not be completely transformed into fatty acid oxidation, and the increase in exercise intensity may weaken the stimulation of EPI on lipolysis (Braun et al., 2018). Additionally, the increased lipolytic hormone may be dispersed rapidly by the body (Thompson et al., 2012). The potential mechanisms of HIIT weight loss correlate with the following factors: HIIT consumes a large amount of glycogen during exercise, fat is fully oxidized in the recovery period and glycogen is synthesized to supplement the carbohydrate consumed during exercise (Kiens and Richter, 1998); HIIT has a greater stimulating effect on muscle; and triglyceride (TG) is redistributed from adipose tissue to muscle (Kuo and Harris, 2016). When considering the adaptive change of adipose tissue following long-term HIIT, this form of exercise can improve the phosphorylation expression of hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) to improve the lipolysis ability of adipose tissue and promote lipolysis (Liu et al., 2020).

Fat loss effects of MICT and HIIT

Currently, more than 50% of China’s adult population is classified as overweight or obese (Pan et al., 2021) which poses a serious risk to their wellbeing and life expectancy. The participants selected for this research were all classified as obese and had a body fat percentage of more than 30%.

The current recommended exercise requirements for the overweight and obese is defined as thirty to sixty minutes of moderate-intensity exercise (i.e., 46-64%V̇O2max) at least five days a week or with a higher intensity of exercise (i.e., >64%V̇O2max) (ACSM, 2021). However, many people find that the overall volume of exercise proposed is excessive and the duration onerous which results in a lack of adherence by individuals with obesity (Sharifi et al., 2013).

Previous research has identified that HIIT is an effective approach to weight loss and that a 12-week program of HIIT compared to MICT with identical exercise volume has an equivalent (Zhang et al., 2017) or superior impact on fat loss (Zhang et al., 2021). Additionally, it was noted that HIIT is more efficacious in diminishing visceral fat (Maillard et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2015; 2021). This research confirms that HIIT promotes fat loss: there was a comparable fat reduction observed across all 3 of the HIIT cohorts. Additionally, the same HIIT cohorts experienced greater fat loss than the MICT group. The changes in body weight and BMI were parallel between the three HIIT groups but there were no changes among the MICT participants which may be due to the small change in fat mass when considering muscle mass, resulting in no difference in total body weight. Contemporary meta-analyses and systematic reviews have additionally supported the impact of HIIT on fat reduction in obesity (Wewege et al., 2017; Sultana et al., 2019; Sabag et al., 2022a). In agreement with other published studies, the current work signifies that HIIT is a superior approach for fat reduction (when compared to MICT) as it exceeds the critical level of 90%V̇O2max (typically over 8 to12 weeks, intervals of 1 to 4 minutes, 1 to 10 repetitions per session, and a work to rest ratio of between 1:1 and 1:2) (Sabag et al. 2022b). Additionally, the contributions of the varying HIIT regimes to fat reduction are comparable. It should be noted that participation in sprint interval training saves time, is more effective at promoting fat loss than MICT, and could provide an alternative exercise program for obese people.

Role of lipolytic hormones in fat loss (during MICT and HIIT)

The process underlying fat reduction following HIIT should be interpreted from the perspectives of both the acute response and adaptation over the long term. In the first instance, the results from repeated measure ANOVA to compare the immediate changes of EPI after three acute exercise sessions showed that both the HIIT120 and HIIT90 groups exhibited significantly higher EPI changes compared to the MICT group, while there was no difference between the two HIIT groups. Additionally, the SIT group showed significantly higher changes in EPI compared to the MICT group immediately after the 44th exercise session. During the 1st, 20th, and 44th training sessions, both the SIT group and the HIIT120 group, as well as the HIIT90 group, demonstrated significantly higher levels of post-exercise blood GH compared to pre-exercise levels. During acute exercise, adipose tissue mobilization is regulated by rapid and slow lipolytic hormones, i.e. EPI and GH, respectively (Scott et al., 2024). Lipolytic hormones accelerate lipid mobilization and degradation by attaching to beta-adrenergic receptors, especially within visceral adipose tissue (Hansen et al., 2012; Freda et al., 2008), heightening the activity of hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) - an essential rate-limiting lipolytic enzyme - and enhancing the decomposition of triglycerides to yield glycerol and fatty acids (Freda et al., 2008; Yang and Mottillo, 2020). Additionally, lipolytic hormones induce the oxidation of lipids which could enhance the rise in EPOC during, and following, exercise. EPOC predominantly derives its energy from the oxidation of lipids (Atakan et al., 2022; Moniz et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2018). Therefore, although the energy source for HIIT in acute exercise is predominantly derived from carbohydrates (Hargreaves and Spriet, 2020), in the present work, the acute HIIT triggered the release of additional lipolytic hormones (EPI and GH) which attached to lipolytic hormone receptors and enhanced HSL function, elevated EPOC, and induced increased lipid degradation and oxidation. Circulation speed is augmented in fat following HIIT (Thompson et al., 2012) which facilitates the delivery of greater titers of lipolytic hormones and further promotes the process.

During long-term adaptation to HIIT, the improved fat reduction is associated with the long-term accumulation of acute HIIT which prompts the body to release additional lipolytic hormones. Furthermore, the continuing fat decrease following HIIT may mitigate against the inactivation of the release of lipolytic hormones seen in individuals with obesity (Hansen et al., 2012). The data acquired by this research indicates that no increase in EPI occurred following exercise in the early and mid-phases of the SIT intervention; however, heightened levels of EPI were observed during the latter stages. These results can be explained by the normalization of lipolytic hormone release following the SIT-induced fat reduction. Liu et al. (2020) used animal models to determine that, following extended periods of HIIT (compared with MICT), lipid cells had a more robust capacity for lipolysis when triggered by the identical lipolytic hormone titer which indicates that high-intensity interval training has a greater effect on heightening the lipolytic hormone sensitivity of adipose tissue. It can be surmised that long-term HIIT can mitigate the inactivation of lipolytic hormone release in individuals with obesity, heighten lipolytic hormone sensitivity and, in the long-term, lead to the release of greater lipolytic hormone concentrations in the course of acute exercise, thus promoting fat reduction.

Study limitations

In this study, there are some confounding factors that should be considered, such as the menstrual cycle of female participants. Although we attempted to record the menstrual cycle of female participants and excluded those using oral contraceptives or individuals with menstrual dysfunction, we were unable to restrict each exercise session to a specific phase of their menstrual cycle, which may have some influence on the results like post-exercise lipolytic hormone response. Moreover, there are limitations in the measurements. One of these limitations concerns the release of the lipolytic hormones following exercise: the time point at which the levels are optimal fluctuates. Due to limitations regarding the frequency of blood drawing, the samples were only collected immediately before exercise, directly following exercise, and three hours after exercise; therefore, the peak levels of the lipolytic hormones may have been missed resulting in an inadequate interpretation of the hormone liberation reactions following exercise. Furthermore, alterations in intra-abdominal visceral fat were not monitored throughout the fat loss. Subsequent studies could exploit the dose-response association between lipolytic hormone level fluctuations and variations in visceral fat levels to explicate how HIIT can diminish visceral fat levels with greater precision. Finally, the data in the current study pertain only focused on obese young females, as such, generalizability of the data is limited, and further exploration is needed on whether similar patterns exist in other age groups and genders.

CONCLUSION

When compared with MICT, 12-week SIT, HIIT120, and HIIT90 interventions were more efficacious in fat reduction in obese women, partly benefiting from the greater release of lipolytic hormones during training sessions

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Postgraduate Innovation Ability Training Programme of the Hebei Provincial Department of Education (Grant No. CXZZBS2023090). The measurement complied with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author who was an organizer of the study.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Xiangui Zhu
Employment: Physical Education College, Hebei Normal University, Hebei, China
Degree: Master (Sports Kinesiology)
Research interests: High-intensity interval training, Overweight/Obesity, Abdominal visceral fat
E-mail: hbnuzhuxiangui@foxmail.com
 

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Jiao Jiao
Employment: Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
Degree: PhD., MSc.
Research interests: Exercise Physiology, Human Ergonomic, Elderly's Fitness, Cognitive Health & Health Literacy
E-mail: jojojiao@hkbu.edu.hk
 

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Yu Liu
Employment: Physical Education College, Hebei Normal University, Hebei, China
Degree: Master (Rehabilitation Therapy)
Research interests: High-intensity interval training, Lactate, Overweight/Obesity, Abdominal visceral fat
E-mail: joanneliu98@163.com
 

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Hong Li
Employment: Physical Education College, Hebei Normal University, Hebei, China
Degree: Master (Sports Kinesiology)
Research interests: Neurological Rehabilitation and Sports Rehabilitation
E-mail: lihong106sky@163.com
 

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Haifeng Zhang
Employment: Physical Education College, Hebei Normal University, Hebei, China
Degree: PhD
Research interests: High-intensityinterval training, Exercise prescription, Exercise rehabilitation
E-mail: zhanghaifeng@hebtu.edu.cn
 
 
REFERENCES
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ACSM (2021) ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription.11th Edition. Wolters Kluwer. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/know/acsm/guidelines-forexercise-testing-and-prescription.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Atakan M. M., Kosar S. N., Turnagol H. H. (2022) Six Sessions of Low-volume High-intensity Interval Exercise Improves Resting Fat Oxidation. International Journal of Sports Medicine 43, 1206-1213.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Borsheim E., Bahr R. (2003) Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Sports Medicine 33, 1037-1060.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Braun K., Oeckl J., Westermeier J., Li Y., Klingenspor M. (2018) Non-adrenergic control of lipolysis and thermogenesis in adipose tissues. The Journal of Experimental Biology 221, jeb165381.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Buchheit M., Laursen P.B. (2013) High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Medicine 43, 313-338.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Cao M., Tang Y., Li S., Zou Y. (2021) Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Overweight and Obesity Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 11905.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Couvert A., Goumy L., Maillard F., Esbrat A., Lanchais K., Saugrain C., Verdier C., Dore E., Chevarin C., Adjtoutah D., Morel C., Pereira B., Martin V., Lancha A. H., Barnich N., Chassaing B., Rance M., Boisseau N. (2024) Effects of a Cycling versus Running HIIT Program on Fat Mass Loss and Gut Microbiota Composition in Men with Overweight/Obesity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 56, 839-850.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Freda P. U., Shen W., Heymsfield S. B., Reyes-Vidal C. M., Geer E. B., Bruce J. N., Gallagher D. (2008) Lower visceral and subcutaneous but higher intermuscular adipose tissue depots in patients with growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I excess due to acromegaly. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 93, 2334-2343.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Gallo G., Faelli E.L., Ruggeri P., Filipas L., Codella R., Plews D.J., Maunder E. (2024) Power output at the moderate-to-heavy intensity transition decreases in a non-linear fashion during prolonged exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology , 1-12.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Granata C., Jamnick N.A., Bishop D.J. (2018) Principles of Exercise Prescription, and How They Influence Exercise-Induced Changes of Transcription Factors and Other Regulators of Mitochondrial Biogenesis. Sports Medicine 48, 1541-1559.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Hansen D., Meeusen R., Mullens A., Dendale P. (2012) Effect of acute endurance and resistance exercise on endocrine hormones directly related to lipolysis and skeletal muscle protein synthesis in adult individuals with obesity. Sports Medicine 42, 415-431.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Hargreaves M., Spriet L. L. (2020) Skeletal muscle energy metabolism during exercise. Nature Metabolism 2, 817-828.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Islam H., Townsend L. K., Hazell T. J. (2018) Excess Postexercise Oxygen Consumption and Fat Utilization Following Submaximal Continuous and Supramaximal Interval Running. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 89, 450-456.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Jones AM. (2023) The fourth dimension: physiological resilience as an independent determinant of endurance exercise performance. The Journal of Physiology , 10.1113/JP284205.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Kiens B., Richter E. A. (1998) Utilization of skeletal muscle triacylglycerol during postexercise recovery in humans. The American Journal of Physiology 275, 332-337.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Koppo K., Larrouy D., Marques M. A., Berlan M., Bajzova M., Polak J., Van De Voorde J., Bulow J., Lafontan M., Crampes F., Langin D., Stich V., De Glisezinski I. (2010) Lipid mobilization in subcutaneous adipose tissue during exercise in lean and obese humans. Roles of insulin and natriuretic peptides. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 299, 258-265.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Kuo C. H., Harris M. B. (2016) Abdominal fat reducing outcome of exercise training: fat burning or hydrocarbon source redistribution?. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 94, 695-698.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Liu Y., Dong G., Zhao X., Huang Z., Li P., Zhang H. (2020) Post-exercise Effects and Long-Term Training Adaptations of Hormone Sensitive Lipase Lipolysis Induced by High-Intensity Interval Training in Adipose Tissue of Mice. Frontiers in Physiology 11, 535722.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine MacInnis M.J., Gibala M.J. (2017) Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. The Journal of Physiology 595, 2915-2930.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Maillard F., Rousset S., Pereira B., Traore A., De Pradel Del Amaze P., Boirie Y., Duclos M., Boisseau N. (2016) High-intensity interval training reduces abdominal fat mass in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes & Metabolism 42, 433-441.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Moniz S. C., Islam H., Hazell T. J. (2020) Mechanistic and methodological perspectives on the impact of intense interval training on post-exercise metabolism. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 30, 638-651.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Muscella A., Stefano E., Lunetti P., Capobianco L., Marsigliante S. (2020) The Regulation of Fat Metabolism During Aerobic Exercise. Biomolecules 10, 1699.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Nie J., Zhang H., He Y., Cao W., Liu Y., Kong Z., George K. (2019) The impact of high-intensity interval training on the cTnT response to acute exercise in sedentary obese young women. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports 29, 160-170.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Pan X. F., Wang L., Pan A. (2021) Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China. The lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology 9, 373-392.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Peake J. M., Tan S. J., Markworth J. F., Broadbent J. A., Skinner T. L., Cameron-Smith D. (2014) Metabolic and hormonal responses to isoenergetic high-intensity interval exercise and continuous moderate-intensity exercise. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 307, 539-552.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Pritzlaff C. J., Wideman L., Blumer J., Jensen M., Abbott R. D., Gaesser G. A., Veldhuis J. D., Weltman A. (2000) Catecholamine release, growth hormone secretion, and energy expenditure during exercise vs. recovery in men. Journal of Applied Physiology 89, 937-946.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Pritzlaff C. J., Wideman L., Weltman J. Y., Abbott R. D., Gutgesell M. E., Hartman M. L., Veldhuis J. D., Weltman A. (1999) Impact of acute exercise intensity on pulsatile growth hormone release in men. Journal of Applied Physiology 87, 498-504.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Sabag A., Barr L., Armour M., Armstrong A., Baker C. J., Twigg S. M., Chang D., Hackett D. A., Keating S. E., George J., Johnson N. A. (2022a) The Effect of High-intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-intensity Continuous Training on Liver Fat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 107, 862-881.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Sabag A., Little J. P., Johnson N. A. (2022b) Low-volume high-intensity interval training for cardiometabolic health. The Journal of Physiology 600, 1013-1026.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Sasaki H., Morishima T., Hasegawa Y. (2014) 4 weeks of high-intensity interval training does not alter the exercise-induced growth hormone response in sedentary men. Springerplus 3, 1-9.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Scott, P., Edward, H. and John, Q. (2024) Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performances. 12th Edition. McGraw-Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/exercisephysiology-theory-application-fitness-performance-howleypowers/M9781264529810.html.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Sharifi N., Mahdavi R., Ebrahimi-Mameghani M. (2013) Perceived Barriers to Weight loss Programs for Overweight or Obese Women. Health Promotion Perspectives 3, 11-22.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Sultana R. N., Sabag A., Keating S. E., Johnson N. A. (2019) The Effect of Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine 49, 1687-1721.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Thompson D., Karpe F., Lafontan M., Frayn K. (2012) Physical activity and exercise in the regulation of human adipose tissue physiology. Physiological Reviews 92, 157-191.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Tremblay M. S., Copeland J. L., Van Helder W. (2005) Influence of exercise duration on post-exercise steroid hormone responses in trained males. European Journal of Applied Physiology 94, 505-513.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Tschakert G., Handl T., Weiner L., Birnbaumer P., Mueller A., Groeschl W., Hofmann P. (2022) Exercise duration: Independent effects on acute physiologic responses and the need for an individualized prescription. Physiological Reports 10, e15168.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Verboven K., Stinkens R., Hansen D., Wens I., Frederix I., Eijnde B. O., Jocken J. W. E., Goossens G. H., Blaak E. E. (2018) Adrenergically and non-adrenergically mediated human adipose tissue lipolysis during acute exercise and exercise training. Clinical Science 132, 1685-1698.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Viru A. (1992) Plasma hormones and physical exercise. International Journal of Sports Medicine 13, 201-209.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Weltman A., Weltman J. Y., Watson Winfield D. D., Frick K., Patrie J., Kok P., Keenan D. M., Gaesser G. A., Veldhuis J. D. (2008) Effects of continuous versus intermittent exercise, obesity, and gender on growth hormone secretion. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 93, 4711-4720.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Wewege M., Van Den Berg R., Ward R. E., Keech A. (2017) The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews 18, 635-646.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Yang A., Mottillo E. P. (2020) Adipocyte lipolysis: from molecular mechanisms of regulation to disease and therapeutics. The Biochemical Journal 477, 985-1008.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Yin M. Y., Li H. S., Bai M. Y., Liu H. X., Chen Z. L., Deng J. F., Deng S. J., Meng C., Vollaard N. B. J., Little J. P., Li Y. M. (2024) Is low-volume high-intensity interval training a time-efficient strategy to improve cardiometabolic health and body composition? A meta-analysis. Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 49, 273-292.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Zhang H. F., Tong T. K., Qiu W. F., Wang J. J., Nie J. L., He Y. X. (2015) Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training Protocol on Abdominal Fat Reduction in Overweight Chinese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Kinesiology 47, 57-66.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Zhang H., Tong T. K., Kong Z., Shi Q., Liu Y., Nie J. (2021) Exercise training-induced visceral fat loss in obese women: The role of training intensity and modality. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 31, 30-43.  Crossref
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Zhang H., Tong T. K., Qiu W., Zhang X., Zhou S., Liu Y., He Y. (2017) Comparable Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training and Prolonged Continuous Exercise Training on Abdominal Visceral Fat Reduction in Obese Young Women. Journal of Diabetes Research 2017, 5071740.  Crossref
 
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2024 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.