Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Follow us
  
Views
118
Download
28
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ( 2026 )  25 ,  675  -  690   DOI: https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2026.675

Research article
Contrast Heat–Cold Versus Thermoneutral Showering in Trained Combat Sport Athletes: A Randomized Field Trial of Recovery Outcomes
Magdalena Hagner-Derengowska1, , Robert Trybulski2,3, Joanna Kruk4, Filipe Manuel Clemente5,6,7, Cyprian Olchowy8, Karol Pilis9
Author Information
1 Sport Research Center, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
2 Medical Department, Wojciech Korfanty Upper Silesian Academy, Katowice, Poland
3 Medical Center Provita, Żory, Poland
4 Institute of Physical Culture Sciences, Faculty of Physical Culture and Health, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
5 Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdańsk, Poland
6 Applied Research Institute (i2A), Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
7 Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center, Coimbra, Portugal
8 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Collegium Medicum, Jan Dlugosz University, Czestochowa, Poland
9 Department of Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, Collegium Medicum, Jan Dlugosz University, Czestochowa, Poland

Magdalena Hagner-Derengowska
✉ Sport Research Center, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
Email: magdalenahagnerderengowska@proton.me
Publish Date
Received: 11-05-2026
Accepted: 07-07-2026
Published (online): 01-09-2026
Narrated in English
 
 
ABSTRACT

Contrast heat-cold showering is popular for recovery, but multisystem evidence and persistence after cessation remain unclear. To evaluate whether a 4-week post-training contrast heat-cold shower intervention produces an integrated recovery profile across four domains (autonomic, endocrine, perceptual, and microvascular) rather than testing a single isolated physiological pathway, across baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and 2-week wash-out (T2). Sixty combat-sport athletes were randomized to contrast showers (10 min alternating warm 38-40°C and cold 13-15°C) or an active thermoneutral-shower comparator (10 min, 32-34°C) after training for 4 weeks. Primary analyses were per-protocol (≥ 75% compliance; n = 57), with intention-to-treat sensitivity analyses. Outcomes were Total Quality Recovery (TQR), morning salivary cortisol (two mornings averaged), resting HRV, and post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH). From T0 to T1, favorable between-group changes were observed for resting HR (ΔΔ -2.10 bpm, 95% CI -2.24 to -1.96; g -0.65; p < 0.001), lnRMSSD (ΔΔ 0.123 log units, 95% CI 0.108 to 0.137; g 0.74; p < 0.001), with similar T1 effects for RMSSD and SDNN, and TQR (ΔΔ 0.61 points, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.95; g 0.80; p < 0.001). These T1 autonomic and perceptual changes were not maintained at T2 (all T2-T0 ΔΔ p > 0.05). Cortisol and PORH-derived outcomes showed no statistically clear between-group differences at T1 or T2 (all p > 0.05). Compared with thermoneutral showering, 4 weeks of post-training contrast heat-cold showering produced short-term favorable between-group changes in autonomic regulation and perceived recovery, but not in morning cortisol or PORH-derived microvascular reactivity. These effects were not maintained after wash-out; therefore, causal attribution to the shower intervention alone and claims of persistent physiological adaptation should be made cautiously. Trial registration: ISRCTN15418049.

Key words: Recovery, combat sports, heart rate variability, post-occlusive reactive hyperemia


           Key Points
  • Four weeks of post-training contrast heat-cold showering improved resting autonomic regulation in trained combat sport athletes, reducing resting heart rate and increasing vagally mediated HRV indices compared with thermoneutral showering.
  • The intervention enhanced perceived recovery after the 4-week period, but autonomic and perceptual benefits were not maintained after the 2-week wash-out, suggesting mainly transient recovery effects.
  • No clear intervention-specific effects were observed for morning salivary cortisol or PORH-derived microvascular reactivity, indicating limited evidence for endocrine or microvascular adaptation beyond training-related changes.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2026 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.