Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Follow us
  
Views
83
Download
29
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ( 2026 )  25 ,  772  -  806   DOI: https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2026.772

Review article
Hop Test Performance is Associated with Return-to-Sport but Shows Limited Association with Reinjury after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yiyan Liu1†, Yuxin Sun2†, Mingde Cao3, Dan Wang4, Lin Wang1, Daniel T.P. Fong5, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung3, Jihong Qiu1, 
Author Information
1 School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
2 Department of Rehabilitation, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
3 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
4 School of Athletic Performance, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
5 National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

Jihong Qiu
✉ School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
Email: qiujihong@sus.edu.cn
Publish Date
Received: 06-04-2026
Accepted: 14-08-2026
Published (online): 01-09-2026
Narrated in English
 
 
ABSTRACT

Hop tests are commonly used to assess return to sports (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), yet whether they can effectively predict successful RTS and reinjury risk remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the associations between hop test performance and the likelihood of RTS and reinjury following ACLR. PubMed, SPORTDiscus with Full Text, MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for studies that included participants with primary unilateral ACLR, assessed functional performance using hop tests and reported outcomes of RTS and reinjury. Data on participant characteristics, follow-up duration, RTS criteria, hop test types and measures, and relevant results were extracted. Data were synthesized using quantitative or qualitative approaches. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the quality of evidence was evaluated with the modified GRADE framework. Forty-three studies involving 17, 350 participants were included. Twenty-four studies investigated RTS and 21 examined reinjury. Meta-analyses revealed achieving a limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥ 90% in single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.33) or triple crossover hop for distance (TCHD) (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.36) was associated with a higher probability of RTS, whereas achieving LSI ≥ 90% in triple hop for distance (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.09) was associated with increased odds of reinjury. Subgroup analyses showed stronger associations for RTS in studies with > 90% hamstring tendon autografts (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.39) and among individuals without meniscal injury (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.69). Overall, low certainty of evidence suggests achieving an LSI ≥ 90% in SLHD and TCHD is associated with a higher likelihood of RTS within two years after ACLR, particularly in individuals with hamstring autografts and without meniscal injury. However, distance-based performance of hop test alone may be insufficient to predict reinjury risk.

Key words: Knee joint, ligamentous injuries, functional performance, return to play, secondary ACL injury


           Key Points
  • A limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥ 90% in the single-leg hop for distance and triple crossover hop for distance was associated with a higher likelihood of successful return to sports following ACLR.
  • An LSI ≥ 90% in the trip hop for distance was associated with a modestly higher risk of ACL reinjury following ACLR.
  • An LSI threshold of ≥ 90% was the most frequently adopted criterion for hop test assessment after ACLR.
  • Current evidence suggests that hop tests are more useful for assessing RTS readiness than reinjury risk, supporting the development of more comprehensive RTS assessment criteria.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2026 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.